• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


N.D. of Mississippi Rules Nursing Home Resident is Third-Party Beneficiary of Agreement to Arbitrate

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011


Tweet

Earlier this month, an interesting arbitration case was decided in the Northern District of Mississippi. In Cook v. GGNSC Ripley, LLC, No. 3:10CV018 (N.D. Miss., Apr. 14, 2011), the court held a nursing home resident was bound to an arbitration agreement as a third-party beneficiary. The American Health Lawyers Association reported,

A federal trial court in Mississippi ruled April 14 that a negligence action against a nursing home by a deceased resident’s estate was arbitrable pursuant to an agreement that her daughter signed as part of the admissions process.

Although the daughter did not have a power of attorney and the arbitration agreement was not a healthcare decision under state law, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi found, the resident was a third-party beneficiary to the agreement under Mississippi contract law.

According to the court, the arbitration agreement became part of the admissions agreement under its express terms. The resident did not sign the admissions agreement, but she was a third-party beneficiary of the agreement given that her care was its essential purpose.

“As such, [the resident] is bound by the terms of the contract, including the arbitration agreement,” the court said.

You may read the entire American Health Lawyers Association article here.

What are your thoughts on the court’s ruling?

Technorati Tags: arbitration, ADR, law

Related Posts

  • N. D. of Texas Compels Arbitration in an Age and Race Employment DisputeN. D. of Texas Compels Arbitration in an Age and Race Employment Dispute
  • Southern District of Texas Compels Arbitration in Class-Wide Suit against AT&TSouthern District of Texas Compels Arbitration in Class-Wide Suit against AT&T
  • Federal Court Sends Data Privacy Dispute to ArbitrationFederal Court Sends Data Privacy Dispute to Arbitration
  • Federal Court Orders Mississippi Nursing Home Neglect Case to Arbitration Based on Resident’s Verbal Consent to Daughter’s AgencyFederal Court Orders Mississippi Nursing Home Neglect Case to Arbitration Based on Resident’s Verbal Consent to Daughter’s Agency
  • Kentucky Supreme Court Revisits Nursing Home Arbitration Case Overturned by SCOTUSKentucky Supreme Court Revisits Nursing Home Arbitration Case Overturned by SCOTUS
  • CMS Issues Proposed New Rule on Nursing Home Pre-Dispute Arbitration AgreementsCMS Issues Proposed New Rule on Nursing Home Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy