• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Medical Privileges in Texas

0
by Rob Hargrove

Friday, Oct 14, 2005


Tweet

Today, the Texas Supreme Court handed down an opinion granting a petition for writ of mandamus pertaining to a nursing home’s claim that certain documents were privileged from discovery based on four distinct asserted privileges:

  1. the medical committee privilege;
  2. the medical peer review committee privilege;
  3. the nursing peer review committee privilege; and
  4. the quality assessment and assurance privilege.

The Court grants the petition for writ of mandamus, holding that the trial court “abused its discretion by using only superficial indicators to deny Living Centers’s privilege claim as to nearly all the documents at issue.” The Court sets forth the kind of analysis it expects courts to use when applying the privileges at issue, particularly in the nursing home context (and since the court holds that three of the four asserted privileges apply to nursing homes “to the same extent as hospitals,” its analysis would clearly also apply in the hospital context).

Cause No. 04-0176, In RE: Living Centers of Texas, Inc.

Technorati Tags:
litigation, Texas Supreme Court, law

Related Posts

  • Big Day for McCarran-Ferguson Reverse Preemption in TexasBig Day for McCarran-Ferguson Reverse Preemption in Texas
  • Texas Supreme Court Rules on Appellate Court Jurisdiction Over Order Confirming Arbitration Award in Part and Vacating the Award in PartTexas Supreme Court Rules on Appellate Court Jurisdiction Over Order Confirming Arbitration Award in Part and Vacating the Award in Part
  •  Texas Supreme Court Denies Cert. Where Agreement Required Arbitrator to be Saudi National or Muslim Foreigner Texas Supreme Court Denies Cert. Where Agreement Required Arbitrator to be Saudi National or Muslim Foreigner
  • Houston Appeals Court Holds U.S. Courts Lack Authority Under Arbitration AgreementHouston Appeals Court Holds U.S. Courts Lack Authority Under Arbitration Agreement
  • Texas Supreme Court Holds Arbitration Agreement Does Not Require Savings ClauseTexas Supreme Court Holds Arbitration Agreement Does Not Require Savings Clause
  • While We Were Out: Texas Supreme Court Decides Perry Homes, et al. v. CullWhile We Were Out: Texas Supreme Court Decides Perry Homes, et al. v. Cull

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy