• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Massachusetts Law Bars Mandatory Arbitration as a Condition of Receiving Free Credit Monitoring Following a Data Breach

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Jan 31, 2019


Tweet

This month, the Governor of Massachusetts signed into law a number of amendments to current state data breach notification legislation.  The law, titled “An Act relative to consumer protection from security breaches,” will impose new data breach notification requirements upon companies and mandates that Massachusetts residents receive credit monitoring services at no cost following a breach involving an individual’s Social Security number.  The law also and prohibits a company from conditioning free credit monitoring services on a data breach victim’s acceptance of a mandatory arbitration clause.  More specifically, the law states:

(b)  A person that experienced a breach of security shall not require a resident to waive the resident’s right to a private right of action as a condition of the offer of credit monitoring services.

The Act was passed after a number of large data breaches occurred at companies such as Equifax and Marriott.  In both instances, the companies initially offered data breach victims complimentary fraud monitoring services that included a mandatory arbitration provision.  Following public outcry, each company indicated the arbitration clause would not apply to a victim’s right to pursue any legal claims related to the data breach in court.  You may read more about the Marriott data breach in a previous Disputing blog post.

The new data breach provisions will take effect on April 11th.

Photo by: Joey Csunyo on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Marriott Won’t Require Data Breach Victims to Individually Arbitrate ClaimsMarriott Won’t Require Data Breach Victims to Individually Arbitrate Claims
  • Illinois Appellate Court Holds BIPA Privacy Claims Are Not Arbitrable Under Terms of Parties’ Employment ContractIllinois Appellate Court Holds BIPA Privacy Claims Are Not Arbitrable Under Terms of Parties’ Employment Contract
  • Another Proposed Class Action Data Breach Lawsuit Ordered to Individual ArbitrationAnother Proposed Class Action Data Breach Lawsuit Ordered to Individual Arbitration
  • Corpus Christi COA Holds Arbitrator Must Decide Whether Arbitral Clause Was IllusoryCorpus Christi COA Holds Arbitrator Must Decide Whether Arbitral Clause Was Illusory
  • Dallas COA Orders Arbitration Based on Electronic Signature and Click Through User AgreementDallas COA Orders Arbitration Based on Electronic Signature and Click Through User Agreement
  • Fort Worth COA Holds Arbitral Agreement Was Incorporated by Reference in Performance Bond DisputeFort Worth COA Holds Arbitral Agreement Was Incorporated by Reference in Performance Bond Dispute

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy