• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Large-Scale Dispute Resolution in Jurisdictions Without Judicial Class Actions

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Feb 04, 2016


Tweet

University of Missouri School of Law Professor S.I. Strong has published “Large-Scale Dispute Resolution in Jurisdictions Without Judicial Class Actions: Learning From the Irish Experience,” ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 22, 2016, Forthcoming; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016-04. In her journal article, Professor Strong discusses innovative developments in the context of large-scale arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in Ireland – a jurisdiction where class relief is not typically available through the court system.

Here is the abstract:

Experts in civil procedure have often wondered how a legal system without a standing mechanism to facilitate resolution of large-scale legal claims would address such matters if and when they occurred. For years, the implicit assumption seemed to be that states without a domestic form of class or collective redress simply did not experience any type of large-scale legal injuries. As it turns out, these types of injuries do exist even in the absence of formal redress mechanisms, as the Irish experience shows.

This Article describes the various types of large-scale actions that have been brought in Ireland in the last twenty years and analyzes how those matters have been resolved in the absence of a permanent procedural mechanism addressing group claims. Though most of the disputes have resulted in what might be described as mass claims compensation procedures, the most recent matter – a product liability issue – seems to have triggered the adoption of a unique type of arbitration. This phenomenon is extremely important, since the legal world has long wondered whether a class, mass or collective arbitration could be brought if the jurisdiction in question did not already allow similar types of claims in the national courts.

This Article provides numerous insights into the resolution of various types of public and private claims, based on the Irish experience over the last twenty years. As the discussion shows, the Irish legal system has incorporated a number of innovative elements, including principles of restorative justice, that deserve wider recognition and analysis. This Article is therefore of interest to readers from around the world, particularly those who specialize in civil procedure and various types of large-scale arbitration. As the discussion shows, there is much the world can learn from Ireland.

This article as well as many of Professor Strong’s other scholarly works are available for download from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit: mozzercork via Foter.com / CC BY

Related Posts

  • Collective Redress Arbitration in the European UnionCollective Redress Arbitration in the European Union
  • Past As Prologue: Arbitration as an Early Common Law CourtPast As Prologue: Arbitration as an Early Common Law Court
  • Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: The Next Frontier for International Commercial Arbitration?Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: The Next Frontier for International Commercial Arbitration?
  • Applying the Lessons of International Commercial Arbitration to International Commercial Mediation: A Dispute System Design AnalysisApplying the Lessons of International Commercial Arbitration to International Commercial Mediation: A Dispute System Design Analysis
  • Anti-Suit Injunctions in Judicial and Arbitral Procedures in the United StatesAnti-Suit Injunctions in Judicial and Arbitral Procedures in the United States
  • The European Succession Regulation and the Arbitration of Trust DisputesThe European Succession Regulation and the Arbitration of Trust Disputes

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy