• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


International Arbitration of Patent Claims

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Oct 11, 2016


Tweet

Thomas H. Lee, Leitner Family Professor of International Law at Fordham University School of Law, has published “International Arbitration of Patent Claims,” in Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers 2015 (Arthur W. Rovine, ed., 2016), Forthcoming; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2849465.  In his paper, Professor Lee offers his proposal regarding how arbitration may be used to avoid parallel patent litigations across international boundaries.

Here is the abstract:

Multinational companies often have multiple patents in different countries on the same invention or innovation. This often results in extremely costly parallel patent litigations in various national courts. In this Essay, Professor Lee proposes how private arbitration might be used to solve the multi-patent, multi-forum litigation problem. The under-utilized U.S. patent arbitration statute, which allows arbitration of patent validity challenges (as well as patent infringement, licensing, and ownership issues) provides a useful basis for the solution.

This and other scholarly works written by Professor Lee may be downloaded free of charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit: jfeuchter via Foter.com / CC BY

Related Posts

  • Reviewing the Use of “Soft Law” in Investment ArbitrationReviewing the Use of “Soft Law” in Investment Arbitration
  • How the Supreme Court’s Misconstruction of the FAA Has Affected ConsumersHow the Supreme Court’s Misconstruction of the FAA Has Affected Consumers
  • The Agreement to Arbitrate and the ‘Applicable Law’The Agreement to Arbitrate and the ‘Applicable Law’
  • The Impact of Investment Arbitration on Investment Treaty Design: Myth Versus RealityThe Impact of Investment Arbitration on Investment Treaty Design: Myth Versus Reality
  • Legislative Approaches to Trust Arbitration in the United StatesLegislative Approaches to Trust Arbitration in the United States
  • An Empirical Survey of International Commercial Arbitration Cases in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, 1970-2014An Empirical Survey of International Commercial Arbitration Cases in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, 1970-2014

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy