• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


International Academy of Mediators (IAM) / Straus Institute Survey on Mediator Practices and Perceptions

0
by Thomas J. Stipanowich

Wednesday, Jul 16, 2014


Tweet

The IAM-Straus Institute Survey on Mediator Practices and Perceptions, was conducted in the spring of 2014 and is one of the three recent surveys carried out by the Straus Institute under the umbrella of the Theory-to-Practice Research Project.  It was facilitated by a grant from the IAM. Here is some initial information regarding the Survey:

Survey group 

  • The IAM-Straus Institute Survey on Mediator Practices and Perceptions was sent to 153 individuals, all IAM Fellows, and 85.0% (130 individuals) participated in the survey; 78.4% (120 individuals) completed the entire survey.
  • The respondent pool included individuals who stated they “regularly practiced” in Africa; Asia, including the Middle East; Australia and New Zealand; Canada; Europe (both Western and Eastern, with a majority from the UK); Latin America; and the United States.

 

Extent of professional mediation practice

  • About ninety percent (89.8%) of respondents indicated that they worked “full-time” at the time the Survey was administered, and devoted, on average, more than seventy percent of their work time to mediation practice.
  • Nearly half (47.7%) of respondents indicated that they devoted more than ninety percent of their work time to practice as a mediator.
  • Survey participants had, on average, over 18 years of mediation experience, and had mediated, on average, almost 1,500 cases.

 

Forthcoming analyses In the coming months the Institute will be publishing a number of in-depth summaries and analyses of mediator perspectives and practices, including:

  • Mediator goals in mediation and self-assessments of “success” and “failure”
  • Mediator styles and strategies
  • Use of caucuses and joint sessions
  • Mediator patterns in communicating with counsel, parties, and others
  • Sources of mediator casework and their relationship to mediation outcomes
  • The role of professional reputations, panel affiliations, marketing, education, and other factors in success as a professional mediator
  • Mediation of class disputes
  • Mediator perceptions of the mediation field-at-large, and factors affecting the field
  • Mediators’ experiences with arbitration, med-arb, and early neutral evaluation

 

Read more on the Straus Institue Theory-to-Practice Research Project.

Read more on the survey of experienced arbitrators.

Read more on the survey of corporate counsel.

 

Related Posts

  • The Straus Institute Theory-to-Practice Research ProjectThe Straus Institute Theory-to-Practice Research Project
  • Part Four:  Arbitration in EvolutionPart Four: Arbitration in Evolution
  • Part Two: Reflections on the State and Future of Commercial ArbitrationPart Two: Reflections on the State and Future of Commercial Arbitration
  • ABA / Straus Institute Survey of Corporate CounselABA / Straus Institute Survey of Corporate Counsel
  • College of Commercial Arbitrators (CCA) / Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution Survey on Arbitration Practice (Fall 2013)College of Commercial Arbitrators (CCA) / Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution Survey on Arbitration Practice (Fall 2013)
  • International Commercial Courts in the United States and Australia: Possible, Probable, Preferable?International Commercial Courts in the United States and Australia: Possible, Probable, Preferable?

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Thomas Stipanowich

Thomas J. Stipanowich is William H. Webster Chair in Dispute Resolution and Professor of Law at Pepperdine University, as well as Academic Director of the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution. The Straus Institute was ranked number one among academic dispute resolution programs each of the last seven years by U.S. News & World Report. He was co-author, with Ian Macneil and Richard Speidel, of the groundbreaking five-volume treatise Federal Arbitration Law: Agreements, Awards & Remedies under the Federal Arbitration Act, cited by the Supreme Court and many other federal and state courts, which was named Best New Legal Book by the Association of American Publishers. He also co-authored Resolving Disputes: Theory, Law and Practice, a law school course book supplemented by many practical exercises. He is the author of many other much-cited publications on arbitration and dispute resolution, and has twice won the CPR Institute's First Prize for Professional Articles (1987 and 2009)--most recently for "Arbitration: The 'New Litigation.'" In 2008, he was given the D'Alemberte/Raven Award, the ABA Dispute Resolution Section's highest honor, for contributions to the field.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy