• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Improving Judicial Performance in Matters Involving International Arbitration

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Jul 30, 2014


Tweet

University of Missouri School of Law Associate Professor S.I. Strong has published a book chapter entitled Improving Judicial Performance in Matters Involving International Arbitration in Selected Topics in International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum, Julio César Betancourt, 2014, Forthcoming; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-19.  In her chapter, Professor Strong examines how best to ensure that judges enforce international commercial and investment arbitration awards.

Here is the abstract:

Parties have long expressed concern about the quality of judicial decision-making in litigation ancillary to international arbitration. Although parties can and often do contract in advance for experienced arbitrators and efficient procedures, all of that planning and forethought can come to naught if a judge refuses to enforce an arbitration agreement or award.

For years, the international arbitral community has focused on raising the competence of advocates in international arbitration, based on the belief that a well-prepared bar is the best means of ensuring a well-informed bench. However, those efforts have and will continue to fail for a variety of reasons.

This chapter discusses why attempts to educate judges indirectly through practitioners are ineffective and what steps are being taken by states and other international actors to improve the quality of judicial decision-making in matters relating to international commercial and investment arbitration. In so doing, the discussion provides useful information on what steps can and perhaps should be taken in the coming years to make sure that national court judges are as well-prepared as possible to address disputes arising out of international arbitration.

This and other scholarly publications authored by Professor Strong may be downloaded free of charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit: toridawnrector / Foter / Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Related Posts

  • Use and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and Conciliation: An Empirical StudyUse and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and Conciliation: An Empirical Study
  • Use and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and ConciliationUse and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and Conciliation
  • Contractual Waivers of Investment Arbitration: Wa(I)ve of the Future?Contractual Waivers of Investment Arbitration: Wa(I)ve of the Future?
  • Beyond International Commercial Arbitration? the Promise of International Commercial MediationBeyond International Commercial Arbitration? the Promise of International Commercial Mediation
  • International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782
  • Law Review Article | Does Class Arbitration ‘Change the Nature’ of Arbitration? Stolt-Nielsen and First PrinciplesLaw Review Article | Does Class Arbitration ‘Change the Nature’ of Arbitration? Stolt-Nielsen and First Principles

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy