• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


ICSID Orders Ecuador to Pay $380 Million to U.S. Oil Exploration Company Over Investment Treaty Violations

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Feb 16, 2017


Tweet

An International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) arbitration tribunal has ordered the Republic of Ecuador to pay a ConocoPhillips’ wholly-owned subsidiary nearly $380 million related to Ecuador’s breach of a bilateral investment treaty (“BIT”) with the United States.  In Burlington Resources Inc., et al. v. Republic of Ecuador, No. ARB/08/5 (ICSID, February 7, 2017), Burlington sought arbitration before the ICSID over two production-sharing contracts related to oil exploration and extraction the company entered into with Ecuador.  According to Burlington, Ecuador unlawfully expropriated the company’s investment under the terms of the BIT.  In 2012, an ICSID arbitral tribunal found Ecuador liable for the expropriation.

Following the ICSID’s finding on liability, Ecuador successfully sought to disqualify a member of the arbitration tribunal.  Despite this, the ICSID denied the Republic of Ecuador’s request for reconsideration on the issue of liability.  Last week, a modified ICSID tribunal issued a $380 million award in favor of Burlington.  In a separate decision, however, the arbitration tribunal ordered Burlington to pay Ecuador $42 million in response to the Republic’s counterclaim over the negative environmental impacts that resulted from Burlington’s actions while performing its oil exploration activities in the nation.

A copy of each decision in this case is available on the ICSID Website.

Photo credit: theglobalpanorama via Foter.com / CC BY-SA

Related Posts

  • Arbitrators Rule in Favor of Chevron in Ecuador Oil Pollution DisputeArbitrators Rule in Favor of Chevron in Ecuador Oil Pollution Dispute
  • Article | Mass Procedures as a Form of ‘Regulatory Arbitration’ | Abaclat v. Argentine Republic and the International Investment RegimeArticle | Mass Procedures as a Form of ‘Regulatory Arbitration’ | Abaclat v. Argentine Republic and the International Investment Regime
  • International Commercial Courts in the United States and Australia: Possible, Probable, Preferable?International Commercial Courts in the United States and Australia: Possible, Probable, Preferable?
  • CMS Issues Final Rule Allowing Pre-Dispute Nursing Home Arbitration AgreementsCMS Issues Final Rule Allowing Pre-Dispute Nursing Home Arbitration Agreements
  • FTC Files First Case Challenging Fake Incentivized Product ReviewsFTC Files First Case Challenging Fake Incentivized Product Reviews
  • SCOTUS Holds Class Arbitration Must be Explicitly Provided for in AgreementSCOTUS Holds Class Arbitration Must be Explicitly Provided for in Agreement

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy