• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


ICC International Court of Arbitration Issues Guidance on Conducting Virtual Hearings

0
by Beth Graham

Friday, Apr 17, 2020


Tweet

The International Chamber of Commerce’s (“ICC”) Court of Arbitration has issued a “Guidance Note on Possible Measures Aimed at Mitigating the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic.”  The note is intended to provide arbitration parties, counsel, and tribunals with timely and useful recommendations for mitigating any disruptions that may result from the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak.  In addition, the document suggests methods for increasing the efficiency of arbitration procedures, how to successfully serve documents and notices, and describes options for conducting virtual hearings.  The guidance note also discusses how best to determine the means for conducting a virtual arbitration hearing as well as cyber-protocols and procedural considerations aimed at ensuring all participants are treated fairly.  Finally, the note provides three useful annexes including a “CHECKLIST FOR A PROTOCOL ON VIRTUAL HEARINGS,” a “SUGGESTED CLAUSES FOR CYBER-PROTOCOLS AND PROCEDURAL ORDERS DEALING WITH THE ORGANISATION OF VIRTUAL HEARINGS,” and an “ANNEX TO PROCEDURAL ORDER.”

You may download the guidance note from the ICC’s website.

Photo by: Daniel Korpai on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • San Antonio COA Holds Payday Lender Did Not Waive Right to Arbitrate When it Filed Criminal Charges Against CustomersSan Antonio COA Holds Payday Lender Did Not Waive Right to Arbitrate When it Filed Criminal Charges Against Customers
  • Third Circuit Rules Delaware Arbitration Program is UnconstitutionalThird Circuit Rules Delaware Arbitration Program is Unconstitutional
  • Elements of the Accountable Care Organization (ACO)Elements of the Accountable Care Organization (ACO)
  • SCOTX Reconsiders its Own 2004 Decision Regarding ArbitrabilitySCOTX Reconsiders its Own 2004 Decision Regarding Arbitrability
  • Top 10 Disputing Posts of 2012Top 10 Disputing Posts of 2012
  • Texas Law on Covenants Not to Compete has ChangedTexas Law on Covenants Not to Compete has Changed

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy