• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (312) 705-9317

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


IBA Updates Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Jan 31, 2011


Tweet

On May 29, 2010, the International Bar Association (IBA) Council adopted new Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration. The new Rules, developed by a Subcommittee comprised of 22 practitioners from a wide variety of legal systems, reflect the first amendments since 1999. The revised rules apply to any agreement to use the IBA Rules made after May 29, 2010.

According to the January 18, 2011 American Bar Association Section of International Law Arbitration Committee Call Minutes, the more substantive Rules,

conform to the actual practice of parties and tribunals in international arbitrations:

  • The revised rules now expressly incorporate a requirement of good faith in taking evidence. While uncontroversial, the implications of this rule, and whether it will lead to anything new in practice, are still unclear.
  • The revisions now provide that the tribunal is to meet and consult with the parties at the earliest appropriate time regarding anticipated evidentiary issues. This frequently occurs already, either by way of institutional rules or simply as a matter of practice.
  • Again consistent with actual practice, under the new revisions, documents are to be produced in the first instance only to the opposing party, and not to the tribunal.
  • The amendments now provide greater guidance to the tribunal on how to address requests for documents or information maintained in electronic form, e.g., by way of limiting to certain document ‘custodians’ or by using a list of search terms designed to cull out irrelevant documents.
  • Confidentiality protections governing documents have been expanded; now, any documents submitted in an arbitration, whether by a party or non-party, are automatically considered confidential. This revision was designed to account for the wide variation in national laws on this subject.
  • The revisions provide more specific guidance for arbitrators regarding issues of legal privilege; however, the rules do not endorse or adopt any single approach as they vary across jurisdictions.

Disputing previously discussed the new Rules here. More information, including a link to the new IBA Rules, is available here.

Technorati Tags: law, ADR, arbitration

Related Posts

  • A Fair Fight: Professional Guidelines in International ArbitrationA Fair Fight: Professional Guidelines in International Arbitration
  • IBA Adopts New Guidelines on Party Representation in International ArbitrationIBA Adopts New Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration
  • IBA Seeks Comments on Proposed Guidelines for Drafting International Arbitration ClausesIBA Seeks Comments on Proposed Guidelines for Drafting International Arbitration Clauses
  • International Investment Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Guide to Web Based ResourcesInternational Investment Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Guide to Web Based Resources
  • FINRA Seeks Public Comment Regarding Proposed Amendments to Arbitration RulesFINRA Seeks Public Comment Regarding Proposed Amendments to Arbitration Rules
  • Drafting the International Arbitration Clause: Part OneDrafting the International Arbitration Clause: Part One

Like this article? Share it!


  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy