• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Houston COA Overturns Harris County Court Decision Confirming Arbitral Award Without Rendering Final Judgment

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Oct 22, 2014


Tweet

The Fourteenth District Court of Appeals in Houston has reversed a lower court’s decision confirming an arbitral award without rendering a final judgment. In Leslie v. Hill, No. 14-13-00600-CV (October 16, 2014), two individuals, the Hills, entered into a contract to purchase a majority interest a company from Robert Leslie in 2007. A provision in the agreement stated all disputes related to the purchase contract would be decided through binding arbitration in Louisiana. The arbitral provision also stated the prevailing party would be entitled to recover reasonable legal fees.

Eventually, a payment dispute arose between the parties. As a result, Leslie initiated arbitral proceedings pursuant to the contract. After an arbitrator issued a damages award that included prejudgment interest and attorneys’ fees in favor of Leslie, he sought to confirm the award in Harris County, Texas. Because the court was not certain “whether Texas law allowed a trial court to confirm an arbitration award containing an award of prejudgment interest and attorneys’ fees,” the Harris County court denied Leslie’s motion to confirm the arbitration award. Leslie then filed another motion to confirm which the court also “denied because it concluded Texas law did not allow recovery of attorneys’ fees that included accrued interest.”

After Leslie filed a third motion to confirm the arbitrator’s award, the Hills asked the court to instead vacate the award because it was based on a gross mistake. Although the Harris County court held that there was no such mistake, the court stated the arbitration award contravened Texas law. Because of this, the court finally confirmed the arbitration award but refused to enter a final judgment in favor of Leslie based on the award. Leslie then filed an appeal with the Fourteenth District Court of Appeals.

The appeals court first stated it was unclear whether the Federal Arbitration Act or the Texas General Arbitration Act applied to the case. Despite this, the court said the outcome would be the same no matter which statute applied. After analyzing the language of the two laws, the Houston appellate court said,

Here, the trial court concluded the Hills had not presented any grounds on which the arbitration award could be vacated, modified, or corrected, and it therefore signed an order confirming the award. The trial court refused to sign a final judgment conforming to the confirmed award, however, because it concluded the award contravened Texas law.

We hold this refusal was error because neither the TGAA nor the FAA give a trial court any discretion to refuse to render a final judgment after confirming an arbitration award. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 171.092 (providing that when trial court grants “an order that confirms . . . an award, the court shall enter a judgment or decree conforming to the order”); Chiron Corp., 207 F.3d at 1133 (stating FAA requires entry of judgment upon confirmation of arbitration award). Even if the trial court were correct that the arbitrator awarded relief that could not have been awarded under Texas law in a non-arbitration case, that does not provide a basis for refusing to render judgment on the confirmed award. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 171.090; see also Chiron Corp., 207 F.3d at 1133 (stating FAA requires entry of judgment upon confirmed arbitration award without reviewing merits of award or legal basis supporting it); Barton v. Fashion Glass and Mirror, Ltd., 321 S.W.3d 641, 646 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (reasoning that arbitrator can grant relief that trial court cannot because its authority is derived from arbitration agreement). Because the trial court erred when it refused to sign a final judgment incorporating the confirmed arbitration award, we sustain Leslie’s consolidated issues on appeal.

In the end, Texas’ Fourteenth District Court of Appeals in Houston reversed the lower court’s decision and rendered a final judgment confirming the arbitrator’s award.

Photo credit: I’ll Never Grow Up / Foter / CC BY

Related Posts

  • Texas Court of Appeals Vacates Arbitration Award Based on Evident PartialityTexas Court of Appeals Vacates Arbitration Award Based on Evident Partiality
  • Beaumont COA Holds Section 9 of the FAA Established One Year SOLBeaumont COA Holds Section 9 of the FAA Established One Year SOL
  • Houston COA Confirms Arbitration Award in Construction DisputeHouston COA Confirms Arbitration Award in Construction Dispute
  • Houston COA Orders Arbitration After Man Ratifies Procedurally Unconscionable AgreementHouston COA Orders Arbitration After Man Ratifies Procedurally Unconscionable Agreement
  • Dallas COA Affirms Arbitral Award Despite Evident Partiality ClaimsDallas COA Affirms Arbitral Award Despite Evident Partiality Claims
  • Fifth Circuit Affirms Arbitrator’s Decision in Insurance DisputeFifth Circuit Affirms Arbitrator’s Decision in Insurance Dispute

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy