• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


GUEST-POST | The US Consumer Finance Protection Bureau Announces Its Review of Mandatory Pre-dispute Arbitration Agreements

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Tuesday, May 01, 2012


Tweet

By Mark Kantor

On April 24, the US Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced that it is commencing its review of mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements with respect to consumer finance products and services. See the Bloomberg report of the CFPB announcement here.

As readers may know, there has been heated discussion that the US Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion will enable financial institutions to compel consumers to arbitrate disputes under contracts of adhesion, but deny consumers the leverage of class actions – that Concepcion will de facto kill consumer class actions. The legislative authority of the CFPB to ban or limit pre-dispute arbitration agreements between a financial institution and a consumer for a “consumer financial product or service” has sometimes been overlooked in that discussion.

Many consumer contracts do not involve consumer financial products or services (e.g., mobile phone contracts and retail sales). However, credit cards, bank accounts, money orders, money transfers, and many other financial services and products encompass a large proportion of consumer contracts typically containing arbitration clauses in the US.

Back in 2010, the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation banned mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements for residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit and for certain financial “whistleblower” disputes. In addition, that legislation (i) authorized the SEC, after a review, to limit or prohibit mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements with respect to claims against broker-dealers and investment advisors and (ii) authorized the newly created Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, after a review, to limit or prohibit mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements with respect to claims with respect to consumer finance products and services (read more here).

The announcement by the CFPB triggers the beginning of the consumer finance arbitration review process contemplated by Dodd-Frank. The SEC has not yet formally begun its similar review with respect to broker-dealers and investment advisers (which, unlike the CFPB review of consumer finance transactions, is not limited to transactions with individuals).


Mark Kantor is an international arbitrator who teaches courses in International Business Transactions and in International Arbitration as an Adjunct Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center (Recipient, 2006 Fahy Award for Outstanding Adjunct Professor). He is also a Fellow at the Vale Columbia Center for Sustainable International Investment (a joint undertaking of Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University).

Related Posts

  • Financial Consumers Can Only Avoid Arbitration By Using A Credit UnionFinancial Consumers Can Only Avoid Arbitration By Using A Credit Union
  • Senate Narrowly Votes to Rescind New CFPB Arbitration RuleSenate Narrowly Votes to Rescind New CFPB Arbitration Rule
  • Lawsuit Seeks to Halt CPFB Rule Against Mandatory Arbitration Agreements that Ban Class-ActionsLawsuit Seeks to Halt CPFB Rule Against Mandatory Arbitration Agreements that Ban Class-Actions
  • CFPB Requests Comments on the Use of Agreements Providing for Arbitration | Deadline June 23, 2012CFPB Requests Comments on the Use of Agreements Providing for Arbitration | Deadline June 23, 2012
  • SEC Commissioner Speaks on Mandatory ArbitrationSEC Commissioner Speaks on Mandatory Arbitration
  • SEC Approves FINRA Plan to Allow All-Public Arbitration PanelsSEC Approves FINRA Plan to Allow All-Public Arbitration Panels

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy