• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Fraport v. Philippines, ICSID, and Counsel Disqualification: The Power and the Praxis

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Jan 12, 2015


Tweet

Catherine A. Rogers, Professor of Law, Paul and Marjorie Price Faculty Scholar, and Professor of Ethics, Regulation, and The Rule of Law at Pennsylvania State University’s Dickinson School of Law, and Alex Wiker, Post-Graduate Fellow in International Arbitration at Pennsylvania State University, have published “Fraport v. Philippines, ICSID, and Counsel Disqualification: The Power and the Praxis,” Journal of World Investment and Trade, 2014.  In their paper, the authors discuss the role of international arbitral tribunals in assessing and enforcing ethical obligations imposed on attorneys.

Here is the abstract:

An important 2008 ICSID ad hoc Committee ruling on disqualification of counsel has recently been published. The decision was rendered in the Fraport v. Philippines dispute. It was issued in the shadow of (but without reference to) HEP v. Slovenia. The Fraport decision arrives in the midst of a larger, ongoing debate in the international arbitration community generally about arbitral tribunals’ role in assessing attorney conduct and tribunal power to impose consequences for alleged misconduct.

Earlier installments in the debate over counsel conduct focused almost exclusively on conflicts of interest between attorneys and the tribunal. Fraport represents an important contribution to the debate because it contemplates counsel conflicts of interest with parties. These types of conflicts, and allegations of counsel misconduct more generally, are increasingly common not only in investment arbitration, but also in international commercial arbitration cases.

This essay explores, through the Fraport decision and other related cases tribunals’ exercise of such power, analysis about the sources of such power, and the need for more deliberative efforts to clarify both the substance of the ethical obligations of counsel and the role of arbitral tribunals in enforcing such obligations.

This and other academic papers written by Professor Rogers and Mr. Wiker may be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit: tuppus / Foter / CC BY

Related Posts

  • The ICSID Conciliation Rules in PracticeThe ICSID Conciliation Rules in Practice
  • The Arbitration-Litigation ParadoxThe Arbitration-Litigation Paradox
  • Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: The Next Frontier for International Commercial Arbitration?Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: The Next Frontier for International Commercial Arbitration?
  • Applying the Lessons of International Commercial Arbitration to International Commercial Mediation: A Dispute System Design AnalysisApplying the Lessons of International Commercial Arbitration to International Commercial Mediation: A Dispute System Design Analysis
  • Empirical Findings on International Arbitration: An OverviewEmpirical Findings on International Arbitration: An Overview
  • International Arbitration, Judicial Education, and Legal ElitesInternational Arbitration, Judicial Education, and Legal Elites

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy