• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Article | FINRA to Propose New Rule For All-Public Arbitration Panels

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Sep 30, 2010


Tweet

Next month, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) will file a rule proposal to expand a two-year-old Public Arbitrator Pilot Program (pilot program) which would allow all investors filing arbitration claims the option of having an all-public arbitration panel. FINRA’s rule proposal will be filed for approval with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If approved, the rule would allow investors to choose an arbitration panel with two public arbitrators and one non-public arbitrator or an all-public panel. Currently, the pilot program allows investors filing an arbitration claim against 14 firms that volunteered for the program the option of choosing an all-public panel. The current pilot program is also limited to cases that do not involve individual brokers. The proposed rule would expand the pilot program to include all investor disputes against any firm and any individual broker, although the proposed rule would not apply to disputes involving only industry parties.

More than 60 percent (approximately 560 cases) of eligible investors chose to opt in since the pilot program began in October 2008. Of those investors, approximately 50 percent chose to include one non-public arbitrator on their panel. The pilot program was originally slated to conclude in October 2010, however, participating firms recently agreed to extend the pilot program for one-year in order to allow time for the rule making process to be completed.

You can read an interesting article about the rule proposal here. The FINRA news release may be read here.?

Disputing blogged on FINRA’s Public Arbitrator Pilot Program previously here.

Technorati Tags: law, ADR, arbitration, FINRA, securities arbitration,

Related Posts

  • N.D. of Texas Issues Temporary Restraining Order Enjoining FINRA ArbitrationsN.D. of Texas Issues Temporary Restraining Order Enjoining FINRA Arbitrations
  • SEC Approves FINRA Plan to Allow All-Public Arbitration PanelsSEC Approves FINRA Plan to Allow All-Public Arbitration Panels
  • FINRA Seeks Public Comment Regarding Proposed Amendments to Arbitration RulesFINRA Seeks Public Comment Regarding Proposed Amendments to Arbitration Rules
  • The Historical Basis of Securities Arbitration as an Investor Protection MechanismThe Historical Basis of Securities Arbitration as an Investor Protection Mechanism
  • SEC Seeks Additional Public Comments Over Proposed Changes to Who May Serve as a FINRA Public ArbitratorSEC Seeks Additional Public Comments Over Proposed Changes to Who May Serve as a FINRA Public Arbitrator
  • FINRA Board Approves New Rule for Selecting Arbitral PanelsFINRA Board Approves New Rule for Selecting Arbitral Panels

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy