• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


FINRA Board Approves New Rule for Selecting Arbitral Panels

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Apr 23, 2013


Tweet

Last week, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Board approved a measure that may make it easier for investors to select arbitrators in a dispute against a securities brokerage. Currently, brokerage customers must agree to resolve all of their future legal disputes with arbitrators previously approved by FINRA. Investor disputes that exceed $100,000 are decided before panel of three FINRA arbitrators. Although customers may affirmatively choose to utilize a panel that includes three public arbitrators, FINRA panels generally default to include one arbitrator with Wall Street experience.

The newly approved measure would authorize the parties to a dispute that exceeds $100,000 to select a panel chairman, a public arbitrator, and an arbitrator with industry ties from a FINRA list immediately. In addition, the parties may choose to reject all arbitrators with Wall Street experience at the same time. The proposal is reportedly popular with investors since they would no longer be required to opt out of using an arbitrator with industry ties straightaway or lose the opportunity. This is significant because some investors and others who engage in FINRA arbitral proceedings reportedly believe that arbitrators with Wall Street ties may demonstrate bias against investors. The measure will now be sent to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for approval.

Related Posts

  • Opening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA ArbitrationOpening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA Arbitration
  • SEC Seeks Additional Public Comments Over Proposed Changes to Who May Serve as a FINRA Public ArbitratorSEC Seeks Additional Public Comments Over Proposed Changes to Who May Serve as a FINRA Public Arbitrator
  • FINRA Considering Whether Firms Should be Required to Carry Insurance to Pay Arbitration AwardsFINRA Considering Whether Firms Should be Required to Carry Insurance to Pay Arbitration Awards
  • Fourth Circuit Decides FINRA Rules to Govern Dispute Over Auction Rate SecuritiesFourth Circuit Decides FINRA Rules to Govern Dispute Over Auction Rate Securities
  • Forbes: Lehman Brothers Loses Nearly $500,000 Collection Case Against Former EmployeeForbes: Lehman Brothers Loses Nearly $500,000 Collection Case Against Former Employee
  • Article | FINRA to Propose New Rule For All-Public Arbitration PanelsArticle | FINRA to Propose New Rule For All-Public Arbitration Panels

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy