• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Fifth Circuit Rules on Arbitration Nonsignatories Rights’ Under the New York Convention

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Monday, May 31, 2010


Tweet

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that nonsignatories to arbitration agreements may be compelled to arbitrate under the New York Convention.

In Todd v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Limited, No. 09-30177 (5th Cir. March 18, 2010) Anthony Todd was injured in Louisiana while working as a chef aboard the steamship American Queen, owned and operated by the Delta Queen Steamboat Company (“Delta Queen”). Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Limited (“Steamship”) insured Delta Queen against liability for injuries to its employees.

Todd won a lawsuit against Delta Queen but was unable to collect because Delta Queen had filed for bankruptcy. Since a Louisiana statue allows to file a direct suit against insurers, Todd was allowed to sue Steamship. Steamship, however, removed to federal court and then moved to compel arbitration under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (The “New York Convention”).

Steamship argued that Todd was bound by an arbitration clause requiring Delta Queen to arbitrate with Steamship. The district court refused to compel arbitration citing Zimmerman v. International Companies & Consulting Inc., 107 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 1997). In Zimmerman, the court found that a plaintiff was not a party to the arbitration agreement and thus it had no binding effect upon him.

The Fifth Circuit first began by distinguishing the facts of Zimmerman from the present case. Next, the court noted that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle, 129 S. Ct. 1896 (2009) had overruled Zimmerman. In Carlisle, the Court held that nonsignatories to arbitration agreements may be compelled to arbitrate if the relevant state contract law allows the nonparty to enforce the agreement.

Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded the case with instructions for the district court to determine whether Todd, as a nonsignatory, could be compelled to arbitrate.

Technorati Tags:
ADR, law, arbitration

Related Posts

  • Fifth Circuit Finds that Nonsignatories Are Bound by Decedent’s Arbitration Agreement Fifth Circuit Finds that Nonsignatories Are Bound by Decedent’s Arbitration Agreement
  • Fifth Circuit Holds Procedural Questions for ICDR to DecideFifth Circuit Holds Procedural Questions for ICDR to Decide
  • Fifth Circuit Reverses Order Compelling Non-Signatory to ArbitrateFifth Circuit Reverses Order Compelling Non-Signatory to Arbitrate
  • Fifth Circuit Rules on Arbitrator Appointment Process Fifth Circuit Rules on Arbitrator Appointment Process
  • Fifth Circuit Refuses to Compel Nonsignatory to ArbitrateFifth Circuit Refuses to Compel Nonsignatory to Arbitrate
  • 2009 Arbitration Case Law: U.S. Supreme Court2009 Arbitration Case Law: U.S. Supreme Court

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy