• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Fifth Circuit Overturns W.D. Texas Order Compelling Arbitration in FLSA Case

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Jul 10, 2019


Tweet

The nation’s Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a Texas federal court’s order compelling an at-will employee to arbitrate a pay dispute with her employer.  In Trammell v. AccentCare, Inc., No. 18-50872 (5th Cir., June 7, 2019), a woman, Trammell, provided in-home personal care assistance services for a home healthcare provider, AccentCare, for several years as an at-will employee.  In 2016, the company apparently mailed an arbitration agreement to Trammell’s home.  Trammell did not sign the document or return it to AccentCare.

In late 2017, Trammell filed a Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) lawsuit against AccentCare in the Western District of Texas.  Her employer responded to the case by filing a motion to compel arbitration based on the agreement that was mailed to Trammell’s home in 2016. According to Trammell, however, she never received the document and had no knowledge regarding its contents.  In addition, Trammell offered testimony stating her employer was notified about her intermittent difficulties related to receiving mail at her home.

A federal magistrate judge found the arbitration agreement was valid based on the mailbox rule.  Under the rule, “[a] letter properly addressed, stamped and mailed may be presumed to have been received by the addressee in the due course of the mail.” The Western District of Texas adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and issued an order compelling the FLSA dispute to arbitration.  In response, Trammell filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

According to the Fifth Circuit’s unpublished opinion, the mailbox rule is rebuttable:

Whatever the precise amount of evidence required to rebut the mailbox rule’s presumption of receipt, and hence, notice for the purpose of establishing an agreement to arbitrate, Trammell has satisfied it here. Trammell has denied receipt in a sworn affidavit, stating further that she notified three AccentCare personnel about her problems sending and receiving mail at her home, including mail from AccentCare, and that she began driving her time slips to work since they were being lost in the mail. Moreover, while there is no dispute that AccentCare mailed the proposed arbitration agreement to Trammell, the company admits that it cannot produce the signed agreement, which tends to corroborate that she did not sign the agreement. Not that signature was legally required, but the absence of a signed document is not inconsistent with Trammell’s claim of non-receipt. Nor did AccentCare offer affidavits from its employees contradicting what Trammell allegedly told them. Trammell has not merely provided an unsubstantiated affidavit which “does not allege or explain any potential deficiency” in the mailing process. See, e.g., Cash v. AXA Equitable Life Ins., 229 F. Supp. 3d 542, 549–50 (W.D. Tex. 2017). Affidavits that “simply deny receipt . . . are insufficient to undermine the presumption of receipt.” Marsh v. First USA Bank, 103 F. Supp. 2d 909, 917– 19 (N.D. Tex. 2000); see also Tinder v. Pinkerton Sec., 305 F.3d 728, 735-36 (7th Cir. 2002) (affidavit with plaintiff’s bare denial of receipt of arbitration notice is insufficient to create genuine issue of material fact). Trammell has produced here what other parties have not-–controvertible evidence, other than a bare denial of receipt, that there was some irregularity in the mailing process. The district court thus erred in relying on the presumption of the mailbox rule without regard to the competing evidence Trammell provided to rebut that presumption. Because Trammell created a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether an arbitration agreement was formed, she is entitled to a jury trial under Section 4 of the FAA.

Because a question of fact existed regarding whether a valid agreement to arbitrate existed, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the lower court’s order compelling arbitration and remanded the case.

Photo by: Luis Melendez on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Fifth Circuit Holds Employers Are Not Required to Notify Workers Who Signed Individual Arbitration Agreements of Pending FLSA Class LitigationFifth Circuit Holds Employers Are Not Required to Notify Workers Who Signed Individual Arbitration Agreements of Pending FLSA Class Litigation
  • Fifth Circuit Orders FLSA Dispute to Arbitration Based on Delegation Clause in Employer’s Arbitration PolicyFifth Circuit Orders FLSA Dispute to Arbitration Based on Delegation Clause in Employer’s Arbitration Policy
  • Fifth Circuit Holds Class Arbitration is a Gateway Issue for the Courts to DecideFifth Circuit Holds Class Arbitration is a Gateway Issue for the Courts to Decide
  • Fifth Circuit Once Again Reverses Order Compelling Arbitration in Wind Energy DisputeFifth Circuit Once Again Reverses Order Compelling Arbitration in Wind Energy Dispute
  • Fifth Circuit Orders Independent Contractor to Individually Arbitrate FLSA ClaimsFifth Circuit Orders Independent Contractor to Individually Arbitrate FLSA Claims
  • Fifth Circuit Affirms Order Stating Question of Arbitrability Was Delegated to the Arbitrator in $1.6 Billion Oil Lease DisputeFifth Circuit Affirms Order Stating Question of Arbitrability Was Delegated to the Arbitrator in $1.6 Billion Oil Lease Dispute

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy