• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Federally Funded Nursing Homes No Longer Allowed to Require Residents to Sign Binding Arbitration Agreements

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Oct 05, 2016


Tweet

Yesterday, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services published a regulation that bans federally funded long-term care facilities such as nursing homes from using pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements.  Under the new rule, long-term care facilities and residents may still enter into an agreement to arbitrate after a dispute arises.  The final rule is scheduled to become effective on November 28, 2016.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services currently controls approximately $1 trillion in federal funds.  In July 2015, the agency initially proposed a rule that was focused on improving nursing home disclosure and limiting how binding arbitration may be used in such facilities.  The new rule was reportedly expanded to include the withholding of federal funds from nursing homes that require residents to sign mandatory arbitration agreements as a condition for admission at the urging of 16 states and Washington, DC.  As written, the rule states residents at long-term care facilities that receive Medicare or Medicaid funds may no longer be required to relinquish their right to sue nursing homes in court.

The new rule is one of the biggest changes to the governing of federal funding for long-term care facilities in over two decades.  The change will reportedly affect about 1.5 million Americans residing in more than 15,000 skilled nursing facilities across the nation.

Some commentators have argued the new rule goes against the federal policy favoring arbitration enumerated in the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”).  For example, the United States Supreme Court refused to consider whether the heirs of a deceased nursing home resident were bound by an arbitral agreement that was signed prior to the resident’s admission in both 2014 and 2015 despite a split among at least 16 states.  The nation’s high court also declined to hear a challenge to a 2015 Supreme Court of Texas ruling stating the FAA preempts Texas law in a nursing home dispute.

Photo credit: Galt Museum & Archives on The Commons via Foter.com / No known copyright restrictions

Related Posts

  • SCOTX Asked to Reconsider Request to Vacate Arbitrator’s Award Based on Public Policy GroundsSCOTX Asked to Reconsider Request to Vacate Arbitrator’s Award Based on Public Policy Grounds
  • Texas Supreme Court Holds FAA Preempts Texas Law in Nursing Home DisputeTexas Supreme Court Holds FAA Preempts Texas Law in Nursing Home Dispute
  • Texas Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument Over Possible FAA Preemption in Nursing Home CaseTexas Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument Over Possible FAA Preemption in Nursing Home Case
  • SCOTX Grants Petition For Review Over Local Government Arbitration QuestionSCOTX Grants Petition For Review Over Local Government Arbitration Question
  • The Impact of Epic Systems in the Labor and Employment ContextThe Impact of Epic Systems in the Labor and Employment Context
  • U.S. Supreme Court Considering Three Arbitration Cases in October TermU.S. Supreme Court Considering Three Arbitration Cases in October Term

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy