• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Federal Judge Comments on “Why Isn’t ADR More Popular?”

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010


Tweet

By U.S. District Judge W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.

Dear Friends:

I have read with interest “Why Isn’t ADR More Popular? A Report from Harvard.” From my perspective as a judge, I would recommend that lawyers be very careful about inserting mandatory arbitration language into their client’s contracts.

First, I see a great deal of buyer’s remorse in cases where there is a mandatory arbitration clause that leaves a party no choice but to arbitrate. Mandatory arbitration is no panacea. It is costly. Indeed, I hear anecdotally from lawyers that it is becoming more costly than trials. The rules of procedure and evidence are not clear. The arbitrator can be wrong on the law and the facts and his/her decision almost always must be given full effect by courts. There is in actuality no review process under the FAA.

Second, if mandatory arbitration is such a good thing, then why not wait till the dispute arises. The parties are free to agree at that time.

Third, if the goal is to avoid juries (which is a wrong headed goal, by the way), then the parties can just as easily agree in their contract to waive a jury and try any dispute to a judge.

Fourth, if the parties still insist on putting mandatory arbitration language into a contract, they should draft the language very carefully, setting out clear procedures about how to select an arbitrator(s) and about how to conduct the arbitration. This should be thoughtfully considered, at the outset, rather than just some statement that there will be arbitration.

Best wishes,

Royal Furgeson
E-mail: Royal_Furgeson@txnd.uscourts.gov


Source: Federal Bar Association

The Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr. received a B.A. from Texas Tech University in 1964 and a J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law in 1967. He was a United States Army Captain from 1967 to 1969 and an assistant county attorney in Lubbock, Texas in 1969. From 1969 to 1970 he was a law clerk for the Honorable Halbert O. Woodward at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Furgeson was in private practice in El Paso, Texas from 1970 to 1993.

Furgeson currently serves as a federal judge on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. He was nominated by President Bill Clinton on November 19, 1993 and confirmed by the United States Senate on March 10, 1994.
Technorati Tags: law, ADR, arbitration

Related Posts

  • N. D. Texas Holds Prior Arbitration Precludes Fraud Claim in Merger DisputeN. D. Texas Holds Prior Arbitration Precludes Fraud Claim in Merger Dispute
  • Northern District of Texas Compels Wrongful Death of Employee Case to ArbitrationNorthern District of Texas Compels Wrongful Death of Employee Case to Arbitration
  • Graying Federal Judges Weigh Consequences of RetirementGraying Federal Judges Weigh Consequences of Retirement
  • Appellate Court Refuses to Order Uber-Waymo Dispute to ArbitrationAppellate Court Refuses to Order Uber-Waymo Dispute to Arbitration
  • Fifth Circuit Reverses in Part N.D. of Texas’ Order Compelling Arbitration in Health Plan Sales DisputeFifth Circuit Reverses in Part N.D. of Texas’ Order Compelling Arbitration in Health Plan Sales Dispute
  • Northern District of Texas Orders Patent Royalty Dispute to ArbitrationNorthern District of Texas Orders Patent Royalty Dispute to Arbitration

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy