• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (312) 705-9317

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Fairness, Trust, and Security in Online Dispute Resolution

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Feb 01, 2016


Tweet

Noam Ebner, Assistant Professor and Online Program Chair for the Werner Institute at Creighton University School of Law, and Professor John Zeleznikow of Victoria University have published “Fairness, Trust, and Security in Online Dispute Resolution,” Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2015. In their article, the authors examine key concepts in the emerging field of online dispute resolution.

Here is the abstract:

The past fifteen years have witnessed immense growth in the application of technology in the field of conflict resolution. One area of particular interest is the growth of the practice and study of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), which has its roots in the worlds of technology and of Alternative Dispute Resolution. As the field of ODR develops, its terminology and conceptual frameworks require exploration and clarification, with special care taken to convey shared meaning between participants coming from the two contributing worlds noted above.

In this article, we introduce three conceptual areas – key concepts in ODR – that would benefit from such clarification: trust, fairness, and security. We discuss multiple connotations and uses of each term, and explain why developing a clearer understanding of each would benefit the ODR field.

This and other research papers authored by Professors Ebner and Zeleznikow may be downloaded for free from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit: jppi via morgueFile.com

Related Posts

  •  Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part V Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part V
  • Online Dispute Resolution:  An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part IIOnline Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part II
  • Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet an Effective Tool Part IOnline Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet an Effective Tool Part I
  • Digital Disagreements: Neural Networks and Their PotentialDigital Disagreements: Neural Networks and Their Potential
  • Digital Disagreements: Artificial [Intelligence] ArbitrationDigital Disagreements: Artificial [Intelligence] Arbitration
  • Mind the Gap: Bringing Technology to the Mediation TableMind the Gap: Bringing Technology to the Mediation Table

Like this article? Share it!


  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy