• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Executive Order Restricts Mandatory Arbitration of Title VII Claims for Some Federal Contractors

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Sep 14, 2016


Tweet

Two years ago, President Obama signed Executive Order 13673 – Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces (“EO 13673”). Section 6 of the order contains a number of pre-dispute arbitration restrictions that will become effective on October 25th of this year.  Under Section 6, a worker must voluntarily consent to arbitrate any claims that arise under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or relate to sexual harassment or assault if employed by, or acting as an independent contractor for a federal contractor whose awarded contract value exceeds $1 million unless the contract is for “commercial items.”

Section 6 of EO 13673 states:

Sec. 6.  Complaint and Dispute Transparency. (a)  Agencies shall ensure that for all contracts where the estimated value of the supplies acquired and services required exceeds $1 million, provisions in solicitations and clauses in contracts shall provide that contractors agree that the decision to arbitrate claims arising under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or any tort related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment may only be made with the voluntary consent of employees or independent contractors after such disputes arise.  Agencies shall also require that contractors incorporate this same requirement into subcontracts where the estimated value of the supplies acquired and services required exceeds $1 million.

(b) Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to contracts or subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial items or commercially available off-the-shelf items.

(c) A contractor’s or subcontractor’s agreement under subsection (a) of this section to arbitrate certain claims only with the voluntary post-dispute consent of employees or independent contractors shall not apply with respect to:

(i) employees who are covered by any type of collective bargaining agreement negotiated between the contractor and a labor organization representing them; or

(ii) employees or independent contractors who entered into a valid contract to arbitrate prior to the contractor or subcontractor bidding on a contract covered by this order, except that a contractor’s or subcontractor’s agreement under subsection (a) of this section to arbitrate certain claims only with the voluntary post-dispute consent of employees or independent contractors shall apply if the contractor or subcontractor is permitted to change the terms of the contract with the employee or independent contractor, or when the contract is renegotiated or replaced.

Although nothing in EO 13673 prevents a federal contractor from utilizing a mandatory arbitration program, it is a good idea for such contractors and their legal counsel to take some time to review and evaluate any existing pre-dispute arbitration agreements for compliance with the order prior to October 25th.

Hat tip to Ron Chapman and James Murphy at Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. for their thoughtful and informative JD Supra article titled “Will Your Arbitration Program Survive the Contractor Blacklisting Regulations?”

Photo credit: airlines470 via Foter.com / CC BY-SA

Related Posts

  • Executive Order Prohibits Mandatory Arbitration of Federal Employment Discrimination and Sexual Harassment ClaimsExecutive Order Prohibits Mandatory Arbitration of Federal Employment Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Claims
  • Texas Federal Court Enjoins Mandatory Arbitration Restriction in Executive Order 13673 – Fair Pay and Safe WorkplacesTexas Federal Court Enjoins Mandatory Arbitration Restriction in Executive Order 13673 – Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces
  • New Treasury Department Report Recommends SEC Allow Shareholder ArbitrationNew Treasury Department Report Recommends SEC Allow Shareholder Arbitration
  • Austin Magistrate Judge Recommends Arbitration in Employment Discrimination LawsuitAustin Magistrate Judge Recommends Arbitration in Employment Discrimination Lawsuit
  • Congress Considers Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013Congress Considers Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013
  • FEMA Announces Arbitration Pilot Program for Hurricane Sandy DisputesFEMA Announces Arbitration Pilot Program for Hurricane Sandy Disputes

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy