• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (312) 705-9317

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Creating a Framework for Examining Federal Agency Rules Impacting Arbitration

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Aug 03, 2020


Tweet

University of Nebraska College of Law Associate Professor Kristen Blankley has published “Creating a Framework for Examining Federal Agency Rules Impacting Arbitration,” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, Forthcoming. Professor Blankley’s journal article examines how “two frameworks under which agency actions prohibiting enforcement of arbitration agreements could be considered” and touches on the background behind the “contrary congressional command” rule.

The abstract states:

Since 1985, the analysis for determining how to resolve a conflict between the Federal Arbitration Act and another federal statute has been clear—courts should consider whether Congress evidenced a “contrary congressional command” stating that arbitration agreements may not be enforced under the statute. In contrast, no court has created an analytical framework to consider how to compare federal regulatory actions (by rule or adjudication) prohibiting enforcement of pre-dispute arbitration agreements. This article fills the gap and suggests two frameworks under which agency actions prohibiting enforcement of arbitration agreements could be considered—a “contrary congressional command” rule focused on the enabling legislation or a “contrary regulatory command” rule focused on the regulation itself. Although both rules can be supported by public policy, the “contrary congressional command” rule more closely applies current arbitration law to this new context of regulatory actions. This article traces the origins of the “contrary congressional command” rule and demonstrates how that rule can be used in cases involving agency action. This Article also gives concrete examples of how the different frameworks would lead to different results depending on the statutory language at issue, the agency action, and the conceptual framework chosen to analyze the case.

This and other scholarly works written by Professor Blankley may be downloaded free of charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo by: Franck V. on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Texas S.B. 556 and H.B. 1635Texas S.B. 556 and H.B. 1635
  • U.S. Arbitration and Mediation Legislative UpdateU.S. Arbitration and Mediation Legislative Update
  • 2011 Mediation Case Law2011 Mediation Case Law
  • President Barack Obama Signs Legislation that Provides for Arbitration to Appeal Termination of GM and Chrysler Franchise AgreementsPresident Barack Obama Signs Legislation that Provides for Arbitration to Appeal Termination of GM and Chrysler Franchise Agreements
  • NLRB Orders California Grocery Chain to Revise Arbitration Agreement Banning Workers From Maintaining Class ActionsNLRB Orders California Grocery Chain to Revise Arbitration Agreement Banning Workers From Maintaining Class Actions
  • Texas Federal Court Holds that Arbitration Agreement Naming NAF as the Arbitrator is UnenforceableTexas Federal Court Holds that Arbitration Agreement Naming NAF as the Arbitrator is Unenforceable

Like this article? Share it!


  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy