• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Constitutional Conundrums in Arbitration

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Mar 25, 2013


Tweet

S.I. Strong, Associate Professor of Law and Senior Fellow at the University of Missouri School of Law‘s Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, recently published a thoughtful book review entitled Constitutional Conundrums in Arbitration, 15 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution __ (forthcoming 2013).

Here is the abstract:

Professor Peter Rutledge’s new book, Arbitration and the Constitution (Cambridge University Press, 2013), offers the first comprehensive study of the constitutionality of arbitration. The discussion draws together arguments and evidence from a diverse range of constitutional and arbitral authorities and introduces examples and issues from many different sub-disciplines within the world of arbitration. This review essay considers whether Rutledge succeeds in his bold experiment of blending together two such seemingly diverse areas of law by taking a critical look at the strengths and weaknesses of Rutledge’s analysis while simultaneously setting the book within the context of existing and future forms of constitutional and arbitral scholarship.

This and other scholarly papers authored by Professor Strong are available for download (without charge) from the Social Sciences Research Network.

Related Posts

  • Use and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and Conciliation: An Empirical StudyUse and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and Conciliation: An Empirical Study
  • Contractual Waivers of Investment Arbitration: Wa(I)ve of the Future?Contractual Waivers of Investment Arbitration: Wa(I)ve of the Future?
  • Beyond International Commercial Arbitration? the Promise of International Commercial MediationBeyond International Commercial Arbitration? the Promise of International Commercial Mediation
  • Collective Consumer Arbitration in Spain: A Civil Law Response to U.S.-Style Class ArbitrationCollective Consumer Arbitration in Spain: A Civil Law Response to U.S.-Style Class Arbitration
  • International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782
  • Constitutional, Treaty and Statutory Interpretation in International Commercial ArbitrationConstitutional, Treaty and Statutory Interpretation in International Commercial Arbitration

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy