• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Confidentiality and Cybersecurity in Online Dispute Resolution

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Jun 04, 2020


Tweet

Since the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, Disputing blog has worked to synthesize guidance documents from a variety of sources including the AAA, CIArb, CPR, Hogan Lovells, the ICC, and the Seoul Protocol to provide readers with a comprehensive list of best practices for online dispute resolution.  This update highlights some additional resources that may be useful for mediators, arbitrators, and other dispute resolution professionals.

The AAA/ICDR Guidance on Zoom Mediations contains a detailed list of recommended Zoom videoconferencing settings that should be used to help users establish control and maintain confidentiality.  The document also addresses how to optimize the virtual mediation experience and includes a discussion regarding whether to record the online session.

Because cybersecurity is a fundamental part of maintaining confidentiality when conducting mediations or arbitral hearings online, the ICCA-NYC-Bar Cybersecurity Protocol was published to provide dispute resolution professionals with the following:

First, the Protocol is intended to provide a framework to determine reasonable information security measures for individual arbitration matters. That framework includes procedural and practical guidance to assess security risks and identify available measures that may be implemented.

Second, the Protocol is intended to increase awareness about information security in international arbitrations. This includes awareness of: (i) information security risks in the arbitral process, which include both cybersecurity and physical security risks; (ii) the importance of information security to maintaining user confidence in the overall arbitral regime; (iii) the essential role played by individuals involved in the arbitration in effective risk mitigation; and (iv) some of the readily accessible information security measures available to improve everyday security practices.

Additionally, a “Roadmap to Data Protection in International Arbitration Proceedings” is forthcoming from the ICCA/IBA Joint Task Force on Data Protection in International Arbitration Proceedings. The deadline for comments on the consultation draft is June 30th.

If you would like to discuss virtual arbitration or mediation further, do not hesitate to contact Karl’s scheduling team at (512) 345-8537. Additional information on the procedures Karl utilizes for online dispute resolution may be found here.

Disputing blog would like to sincerely thank Mark C. Morril of MorrilADR for providing us with information regarding this additional guidance.

Photo by: Clint Patterson on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Online Dispute Resolution and New In-Person LocationsOnline Dispute Resolution and New In-Person Locations
  • The Impending Battle for the Soul of Online Dispute ResolutionThe Impending Battle for the Soul of Online Dispute Resolution
  • Online Dispute Resolution and the Future of JusticeOnline Dispute Resolution and the Future of Justice
  • International Council for Online Dispute Resolution and National Center for Technology and Dispute Resolution Facilitate ODRInternational Council for Online Dispute Resolution and National Center for Technology and Dispute Resolution Facilitate ODR
  • Fairness, Trust, and Security in Online Dispute ResolutionFairness, Trust, and Security in Online Dispute Resolution
  • Four of the Latest Developments in ADRFour of the Latest Developments in ADR

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy