• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


CFPB Director Pens Letter Urging President to Veto Measure Rescinding New Arbitration Rule

0
by Beth Graham

Friday, Nov 03, 2017


Tweet

On Monday, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) Director Richard Cordray released a letter addressed to the President of the United States urging him to veto House Joint Resolution 111. The measure, which rescinds a new CFPB rule that prohibits most credit card issuers and banking institutions from requiring consumers to enter into mandatory arbitration agreements that bar collective action lawsuits, was narrowly passed by the Senate after the Vice President cast a tie-breaking vote last week.  The bill was presented to the President for his signature the following day and the measure was signed into law on November 1st.

In the letter (from the Los Angeles Times), Director Cordray made a personal appeal to the President stating in part:

Many have told me I am wasting my time writing this letter that your mind is made up and that your advisors have already made their intentions clear. But this rule is all about protecting people who simply want to be able to take action together to right the wrongs done to them. When people are wronged or cheated, they deserve the chance to pursue their legal rights.

You and I have never met or spoken, but I am aware that over the course of your long career in business you often found it necessary to go to court when you thought you were treated unfairly. Of course, most Americans cannot afford to do this on their own, so they have to band together to be able to light companies like Wells Fargo that opened millions of fake accounts or Equifax when it allowed sensitive personal data to be breached for more than 145 million Americans.

I think you really don’t like to see American families, including veterans and service members, get cheated out of their hard-earned money and be left helpless to fight back. I know that some have made elaborate arguments to pretend like that is not what is happening. But you are a smart man, and I think we both know what is really happening here.

You alone now have the power to safeguard people’s ability to take action together and go to court when they are wronged. They deserve to have that right protected. I urge you to heed the views of the American Legion, the Military Coalition, and millions of Americans by vetoing the congressional resolution disapproving the arbitration rule. Thank you for your consideration.

This is not the first time Director Cordray has issued an unconventional appeal in support of the CFPB’s new mandatory predispute arbitration rule.  In August, he published an opinion piece in the New York Times in response to a United States House of Representatives vote to repeal the new rule.

The full text of the CFPB arbitration rule at issue is available on the CFPB’s website.

Photo credit: MoneyBlogNewz via Foter.com / CC BY

Related Posts

  • Senate Narrowly Votes to Rescind New CFPB Arbitration RuleSenate Narrowly Votes to Rescind New CFPB Arbitration Rule
  • CFPB Director Pens NYT Op-Ed Addressing New Rule Against Mandatory Arbitration Agreements that Ban Class-ActionsCFPB Director Pens NYT Op-Ed Addressing New Rule Against Mandatory Arbitration Agreements that Ban Class-Actions
  • International Commercial Courts in the United States and Australia: Possible, Probable, Preferable?International Commercial Courts in the United States and Australia: Possible, Probable, Preferable?
  • CMS Issues Final Rule Allowing Pre-Dispute Nursing Home Arbitration AgreementsCMS Issues Final Rule Allowing Pre-Dispute Nursing Home Arbitration Agreements
  • FTC Files First Case Challenging Fake Incentivized Product ReviewsFTC Files First Case Challenging Fake Incentivized Product Reviews
  • SCOTUS Holds Class Arbitration Must be Explicitly Provided for in AgreementSCOTUS Holds Class Arbitration Must be Explicitly Provided for in Agreement

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy