• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


United States

Myths of Consumer Protection Law

By Victoria VanBuren - May 4, 2009
As previously blogged here, the debate over predispute arbitration clauses in contracts between businesses and consumers, employees, and franchisees is heating up. Supporters of the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 held a press conference last week on “Fairness Arbitration Day.” See related posts after the jump. In contrast, Professor Omri Ben-Shahar from the University of Chicago, spoke recently on the “Myths of Consumer Protec

Continue reading...

Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009: Analysis

By Victoria VanBuren - April 29, 2009
“Arbitration Fairness Day” is today (see background here and here). O. Russel Murray wrote an interesting analysis on the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 (a.k.a. H.R. 1020; the status of the bill is here). He acknowledges that there have been some problems with mandatory arbitration within the context of employment, consumer, franchises, and civil right claims. However, Mr. Murray believes that the Arbitration Fairness Act might be w

Continue reading...

GUEST-POST | Rectifying a Critical Flaw in the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009

By Victoria VanBuren - April 27, 2009
By Philip Loree, Jr. Introduction The Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum is pleased and honored that Victoria VanBuren of Disputing has invited us to guest blog on the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 (the “Arbitration Fairness Act”). Our blog shall likewise be featuring Victoria as a guest blogger from time-to-time. Victoria suggested that the Arbitration Fairness Act would be a particularly pertinent topic in light of the “Arbitration

Continue reading...

Tomorrow’s Guest Blogger and The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009

By Victoria VanBuren - April 26, 2009
[Ed. note: see guest blog post here] Disputing will be honored to have guest blogger Philip Loree, Jr. Phil will be sharing insightful comments and will propose some solutions to the problems that the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 will likely create in disputes between commercial entities. (see past coverage of the Act here and here) Phil is a partner at the boutique law firm of Loree & Loree, where he focuses his practice on reinsurance l

Continue reading...

Arbitration Fairness Day: Follow Up

By Victoria VanBuren - April 24, 2009
[Ed. note: see new commentary on the Act here] Following up on my post of yesterday and to continue with our tradition to explore both sides of the issue, we would like to share with you this study on arbitration published by Public Citizen. Related links: Fair Arbitration Now Public Citizen Calls for 12 State to Investigate Insurers’ Use of Questionable Arbitration Firm Thanks to Cindy Schnackel, from Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings

Continue reading...

April 29: Arbitration Fairness Day

By Victoria VanBuren - April 23, 2009
[Ed. note: see follow up post here and new commentary on the Act here] As H.R. 1020 (“Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009″) blogged here moves through Congress, supporters of the bill prepare to hold a press conference in Washington D.C. on April 29, 2009 to lobby to end prospective arbitration in contracts between businesses and consumers, employees, homeowners, and franchise holders. Find the status of the bill here. Hat tip to Philip

Continue reading...

U.S. Bill Would Limit Consumer Arbitration

By Victoria VanBuren - April 8, 2009
As the U.S. Supreme Court and consumer studies on arbitration praise the benefits of arbitration, the 111st Congress is advancing a bill that would ban arbitration in consumer mortgage contracts. H.R. 1728 proposed by Rep. Miller (D- NC), titled the “Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2009,” would Amend the Truth in Lending Act of 1968. The bill provides, among other things, that “[n]o residential mortgage loan an

Continue reading...

Federal Legislation on Alternative Dispute Resolution

By Victoria VanBuren - March 26, 2009
The following bills related to Alternative Dispute Resolution have been introduced recently by the 111st. Congress. H.R. 1214. Filed by Rep. Gutierrez, (D-IL) this bill, titled “Payday Loan Reform Act of 2009,” would amend the Truth in Lending Act to establish additional payday loan requirements to protect consumers. This bill, among other things, prohibits a mandatory arbitration clause that is “oppressive, unfair, unconscionab

Continue reading...

Federal Legislation on Arbitration

By Victoria VanBuren - February 24, 2009
The following bills are currently being floated around the U.S. House: H.R. 991. To treat arbitration clauses which are unilaterally imposed on consumers as an unfair and deceptive trade practice and prohibit their use in consumer transactions. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services on 02/11/2009. H.R. 1020. To amend Chapter 1 of title 9 of the U.S. Code with respect to arbitration. This is the “Arbitration Fairness A

Continue reading...

12345678

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy