• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Professor Alan Scott Rau

GUEST-POST | Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on BP v ExxonMobil

By Victoria VanBuren - August 6, 2012
by Alan Scott Rau BP Exploration Libya Limited v. ExxonMobil Libya Limited, et al, No. 11-20547 (5th Cir. July 30, 2012) is a little case that illustrates perfectly the muddle that frequently arises when linked agreements bind multiple parties to resolve through arbitration disputes arising out of related transactions. It is at least clear here, unlike some cases, that there has to be “one arbitration”—this is in fact what the agreements se

Continue reading...

Article | The Errors of Comity: Forum Non Conveniens Returns to the Second Circuit

By Victoria VanBuren - May 2, 2012
We invite you to read Professor Alan Scott Rau’s (pictured right) most recent article entitled “The Errors of Comity: Forum Non Conveniens Returns to the Second Circuit,” American Review of International Arbitration, Forthcoming August 2012, Energy Center Research Paper No. 12-04. Here is the abstract: What a federal court is expected to do when asked to enforce a foreign arbitral award — what constraints the Conventions i

Continue reading...

GUEST-POST | Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on Flattery Ltd. v. Titan Maritime LLC

By Victoria VanBuren - November 21, 2011
by Alan Scott Rau Some of the readers of this blog may have missed the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Cape Flattery Ltd. v. Titan Maritime LLC, 647 F.3d 914 (9th Cir. 2011)—in which the court addressed the critical question of how a court is to determine whether a dispute is “arbitrable” for purposes of a motion to compel—and then proceeds to make a complete hash of it. The M/ V Cape Flattery had run aground on a submerged coral r

Continue reading...

American Review of International Arbitration | Arbitral Power and the Limits of Contract: The New Trilogy

By Victoria VanBuren - October 12, 2011
We thought that you might find interesting Professor Alan Scott Rau’s latest article, Arbitral Power and the Limits of Contract: The New Trilogy (October 7, 2011). American Review of International Arbitration, Forthcoming. Here is the abstract: The American law of arbitration has for some reason been replete with what we have become accustomed to call “trilogies” – and the last two terms of the U.S. Supreme Court have curiously continued th

Continue reading...

American Review of International Arbitration Article | Understanding (and Misunderstanding) ‘Primary Jurisdiction’

By Victoria VanBuren - August 31, 2010
We thought that you might find interesting Professor Alan Scott Rau’s latest article, Understanding (and Misunderstanding) “Primary Jurisdiction, American Review of International Arbitration (forthcoming). Here is the abstract: In our “Westphalian” regime of international arbitration, conflict and competition between national jurisdictions, with overlapping and yet plausible claims to supervise the process, become inevitable. The conv

Continue reading...

GUEST-POST | Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson

By Victoria VanBuren - June 22, 2010
By Alan Scott Rau One really needs a few days to absorb the importance of cases like this—I know instant punditry is increasingly de rigueur, but I’m quite uneasy with it. Anyway, with that caveat, one could say the following: The doctrinal importance of the case seems swamped by the overwhelming reality that arbitration, at least in adhesion contracts, has become something of a political football: Apparently “to decide that cla

Continue reading...

Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on Dealer Computers v. Old Colony Motors

By Victoria VanBuren - January 4, 2010
by Alan Scott Rau Can this possibly be right? For one thing, I would have thought that ordering the payment of a deposit should be a matter for the court, not the arbitrator: It seems to be a question of whether and how to “order the parties to arbitration in accordance with their agreement” under section 4 of the FAA—-not a question of the “procedure” for the arbitration. What if the respondent is challenging the very existence of an arbitration

Continue reading...

American Review of International Arbitration Article | Evidence and Discovery in American Arbitration: The Problem of ‘Third Parties’

By Victoria VanBuren - November 16, 2009
Alan Scott Rau, Professor at The University of Texas School of Law and contributor to this blog, wrote recently an excellent article entitled Evidence and Discovery in American Arbitration: The Problem of ‘Third Parties,’ American Review of International Arbitration, Fall 2009. We invite you to check out Professor Rau’s well-known skillful writing on the evolving issue of arbitral powers to collect evidence from non-parties to a

Continue reading...

Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Co.

By Victoria VanBuren - August 10, 2009
Professor Alan Scott Rau, from The University of Texas School of Law, has made the following comments regarding our recent posts on Stolt-Nielsen (see posts Part I, Part II, and Part III). I ‘m afraid I just can’t understand all this talk about “silence,” and I could use some help here. Contracts very often expressly address a problem—in which case courts have the task of “interpreting” just what they said. But often there will be no express prov

Continue reading...

Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on In re Morgan Stanley

By Victoria VanBuren - July 15, 2009
Professor Alan Scott Rau has forwarded us the following comments relating to our post of yesterday, in which we summarized the recent Texas Supreme Court case of In re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., __ S.W.3d __ (Texas 2009) (No. 07-0665). The Texas Supreme Court gets it absolutely right [and totally without regard to the fact that they quote me.] How could it be otherwise? Compare Justice Hecht’s dissent: “A raving lunatic in a stra

Continue reading...

12

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy