Menu
Guest Posts
Guest Post Part II | The Seventh Circuit Issues a Landmark Reinsurance Arbitration Opinion in Trustmark Ins. Co. v. John Hancock Ins. Co. (U.S.A.)
By Beth Graham - February 24, 2011
by Philip J. Loree Jr. I. Introduction Part I (here) briefly discussed Chief Judge Frank H. Easterbrook’s decision in Trustmark Ins. Co. v. John Hancock Ins. Co. (U.S.A.), No. 09-3682, 2011 WL 285156 (7th Cir. Jan. 31, 2011), and its implications on the pending Second and Fifth Circuit appeals in Scandinavian Reinsurance Co. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co, No. 09 Civ. 9531(SAS), 2010 WL 653481 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2010), and Dealer Compute
Guest Post Part I | The Seventh Circuit Issues a Landmark Reinsurance Arbitration Opinion in Trustmark Ins. Co. v. John Hancock Ins. Co. (U.S.A.)
By Beth Graham - February 23, 2011
by Philip J. Loree Jr. Chief Judge Frank H. Easterbrook of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is not only a brilliant judge, writer and law professor, but a master of (among many other things) arbitration law. He understands better than most judges how commercial arbitration is supposed to work, what the Federal Arbitration Act is supposed to achieve, and how to implement the Act to ensure the parties get not only what the
Article | Should States Regulate the Mediation Profession?
By Beth Graham - February 3, 2011
Philip J. Loree Jr., a partner in the Manhasset, New York based firm of Loree & Loree and contributor to this blog, recently published an interesting article entitled Should States Regulate the Mediation Profession? The article was published in the Winter 2010-2011 edition of NE-ACR News, the newsletter of the New England Chapter of the Association for Conflict Resolution. In the article, Mr. Loree argues “proponents of state licensure
Article | Revelation and Reaction: The Struggle to Shape American Arbitration
By Beth Graham - January 28, 2011
Last week, Thomas J. Stipanowich, William H. Webster Chair in Dispute Resolution and Professor of Law at Pepperdine School of Law, and Academic Director of the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, was the keynote speaker at Fordham Law School’s Fifth Annual Alternative Dispute Resolution Symposium. At the Symposium, Professor Stipanowich presented a paper entitled “Revelation and Reaction: The Struggle to Shape American Arbitration.” The pape
GUEST-POST | Is Arbitration the “New Litigation”?: The Choice is Yours
By Beth Graham - January 25, 2011
by Thomas J. Stipanowich (Editor’s note: An earlier version of this posting was published in the Los Angeles and San Francisco Daily Journals.) “Because of expense and delay, both civil bench trials and civil jury trials are disappearing.” So says a task force co-sponsored by—of all groups—the American College of Trial Lawyers. Litigation often costs so much and takes so long, they acknowledge, that parties nearly always settle or stop suin
GUEST-POST | 2010 U.S. Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit Activity Reports
By Beth Graham - January 10, 2011
By Don Philbin U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts released his sixth Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary on New Year’s Eve. While most of the press coverage has turned on his discussion of judicial vacancies, a three-page appendix highlights the workload of the federal courts. The Clerk of the Fifth Circuit produces a similar workload report containing insightful statistics, and the Texas Lawyer recently reviewed certain statistics for t
Guest Post Part II.B | AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion: Can Discover Bank Withstand Stolt-Nielsen Scrutiny?
By Beth Graham - December 6, 2010
Part II.B: Section 2 Express Preemption – Purposive Analysis by Philip J. Loree Jr. I. Introduction In Part II.A, we considered a textual construction of Section 2’s savings clause and concluded that it supports AT&T Mobility’s position. This Part II.B examines the savings clause from a purposive interpretation and construction standpoint. For the sake of convenience, the term “purposive” or “purposivism” is used here as a convenient way to d
Guest Post Part II.A | AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion: Can Discover Bank Withstand Stolt-Nielsen Scrutiny?
By Beth Graham - November 29, 2010
Part II.A: Section 2 Express Preemption – Textual Analysis by Philip J. Loree Jr. I. Introduction Part I of this series (here) was published the day before the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, No. 09-893 (blogged here, here, here and here). Now that the argument has taken place, and we have had a chance to review the transcript (here), and listen to the audio (here), it’s time to begin delvi
GUEST-POST | The Arbitration Vacatur Law Uncertainty Principle
By Beth Graham - November 24, 2010
by James M. Gaitis According to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, (1) the position and momentum of an object cannot simultaneously be precisely known and (2) even more tantalizing, the more precisely one property (whether position or momentum) can be measured, the less precisely can the other. For those that seek overall clarity as to what is going on at the particle and wave level of physics (and perhaps in their everyday lives), the Uncerta
Article | Class Arbitration Outside the United States: Reading the Tea Leaves
By Beth Graham - November 23, 2010
A new paper is available from S.I Strong, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri and contributor to this blog, entitled Class Arbitration Outside the United States: Reading the Tea Leaves. The paper was initially presented at the International Chamber of Commerce’s (ICC) Thirtieth Anniversary Annual Meeting on Multiparty Arbitration, held last December in Paris. The finished work appears in Dossier VII: Arbitration and Multipart
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy