Menu
Guest Posts
Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Co.
By Victoria VanBuren - August 10, 2009
Professor Alan Scott Rau, from The University of Texas School of Law, has made the following comments regarding our recent posts on Stolt-Nielsen (see posts Part I, Part II, and Part III). I ‘m afraid I just can’t understand all this talk about “silence,” and I could use some help here. Contracts very often expressly address a problem—in which case courts have the task of “interpreting” just what they said. But often there will be no express prov
GUEST-POST PART II | Class and Consolidated Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act: What Issues Will the United States Supreme Court Confront in Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. V. AnimalFeeds Int’l Co.?
By Victoria VanBuren - August 10, 2009
Part II: The Legal Landscape: Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle By Philip J. Loree Jr. Introduction As discussed in Part I, Stolt-Nielsen is a do-over of sorts. Back in 2003 the United States Supreme Court set out to decide in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle whether imposing class arbitration on parties whose agreement is silent on that point is consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act. But that never happened because it turned out the
GUEST-POST PART I | Class and Consolidated Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act: What Issues Will the United States Supreme Court Confront in Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. V. AnimalFeeds Int’l Co.?
By Victoria VanBuren - August 6, 2009
Part I: Introduction By Philip J. Loree Jr. Introduction The Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum is delighted to guest post once again on Karl Bayer’s and Victoria VanBuren’s wonderful ADR blog, Disputing. Because Victoria and I have both written fairly extensively about Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel, Inc, 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008), and about two of the most frequently cited cases construing Hall Street’s dictum on manifest disregard of the l
GUEST-POST | Part Two: The Emergence in the Last Month of an Express Judicial Recognition that Arbitration Clauses Barring Class Relief in Consumer Agreements Are Void
By Victoria VanBuren - July 28, 2009
By Peter Friedman In Part One, we asked whether there is any solution to the problem created by mandatory arbitration clauses and class action waivers in consumer online transactions. As a general rule, courts hold that mandatory arbitration clauses are enforceable. Thus, for example, the Pennsylvania Law Encyclopedia explains that under the Uniform Arbitration Act, a version of which governs the use of arbitration in virtually 36 states, mandato
GUEST-POST: “Alternative” Dispute Resolution, the Rhetoric of Naming, and the Emerging Trend to Invalidate Mandatory Arbitration Clauses and Class Action Waivers in Consumer Agreements
By Victoria VanBuren - July 27, 2009
By Peter Friedman Part One – The Problem: Mandatory Arbitration clauses that preclude class relief in consumer agreements make arbitration a means of precluding consumers from obtaining any feasible relief. Calling “Alternative Rock” a certain style of music some students at liberal arts colleges enjoy has long given the music a sheen of integrity, the kind of integrity parodied as pretense by calling those fans “granola eaters” who wear Birkenst
GUEST-POST: The Psychology of Overconfidence and Mediation
By Victoria VanBuren - July 23, 2009
By Don Philbin In this week’s The New Yorker, one of my favorite writers explores how “optimistic overconfidence” contributed to the quick downfall of the mighty Bear Stearns. Malcolm Gladwell, author of Blink, The Tipping Point, and Outliers, chronicles the meteoric rise of Jimmy Cayne, copier salesman turned professional bridge player turned investment banker, to the top of Bear Stearns. A student of history, Gladwell uses the British-led invas
Global Arbitration Review Article: ‘Bad Faith’ Costs Decision Upheld
By Victoria VanBuren - July 22, 2009
Last week, the Global Arbitration Review published an interesting article about a recent case, ReliaStar Life Ins. Co, of N.Y. v. EMC Nat’l Life Co., No. 07-0828 (2nd Cir. Apr. 9, 2009). As previously blogged here, in ReliaStar, the Second Circuit held that inclusion in an arbitration agreement of a broad statement that each party will bear the expenses of its own arbitrator and attorney’s fees, does not deprive the arbitration panel of authority
Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on In re Morgan Stanley
By Victoria VanBuren - July 15, 2009
Professor Alan Scott Rau has forwarded us the following comments relating to our post of yesterday, in which we summarized the recent Texas Supreme Court case of In re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., __ S.W.3d __ (Texas 2009) (No. 07-0665). The Texas Supreme Court gets it absolutely right [and totally without regard to the fact that they quote me.] How could it be otherwise? Compare Justice Hecht’s dissent: “A raving lunatic in a stra
Law Journal Article: “Civil Jury Trials R.I.P.? Can it Actually Happen in America?” and the Federal Arbitration Act
By Victoria VanBuren - July 4, 2009
During this Fourth of July holiday weekend, our good friend Don Philbin stumbled across “Civil Jury Trials R.I.P.? Can it Actually Happen in America?” 40 St. Mary’s L.J. 795 written by the Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr. In the article, Judge Furgeson discusses the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007, which is analogous to the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 (previously blogged here) currently considered in the U.S. Congress. If
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Guest-Post: Texas House Bill 1083
By Victoria VanBuren - June 26, 2009
On June 19, 2009, Texas House Bill 1083 was signed into law.The new provision, effective immediately, prevents courts from ordering mediation in cases subject to the Federal Arbitration Act (excepting cases where the parties have agreed otherwise).The bill, which passed both the House and the Senate without amendment, applies to all actions commencing on or after June 19th. What does this mean for future Texas cases involving the FAA?Fewer
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy