Menu
U.S. Supreme Court
Guest Post Part II.A | AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion: Can Discover Bank Withstand Stolt-Nielsen Scrutiny?
By Beth Graham - November 29, 2010
Part II.A: Section 2 Express Preemption – Textual Analysis by Philip J. Loree Jr. I. Introduction Part I of this series (here) was published the day before the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, No. 09-893 (blogged here, here, here and here). Now that the argument has taken place, and we have had a chance to review the transcript (here), and listen to the audio (here), it’s time to begin delvi
Supreme Court Hears Arguments in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
By Beth Graham - November 10, 2010
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 09-893, a class-wide arbitration case from the 9th Circuit. AT&T concerns the applicability of state law unconscionability defenses to class arbitration exclusion clauses in consumer arbitration agreements. In the case, Vincent and Liza Concepcion sued AT&T in California over a charge of approximately $30 in connection with purchasing a ce
Supreme Court to Hear AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion Today
By Beth Graham - November 9, 2010
The U. S. Supreme Court will hear AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 09-893, a class-wide arbitration case from the 9th Circuit, today. In the case, the Court is asked to consider whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts states from conditioning enforcement of an arbitration agreement on the availability of particular procedures when those procedures are not necessary to ensure that the parties to the arbitration agreement are able to
Guest Post Part I | AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion: Can Discover Bank Withstand Stolt-Nielsen Scrutiny?
By Beth Graham - November 8, 2010
by Philip J. Loree Jr. Part I: Introduction Virtually every year the United States Supreme Court’s docket features a number of politically-charged, controversial cases, plus some run-of-the-mill ones that do not inspire much in the way of intensive, ideological debate. Generally the Court’s arbitration-related cases fall into this latter category, though last term saw the Court decide 5-3 and 5-4 along ideological lines two politically controvers
Law Review Article | The Litigation-Arbitration Dichotomy Meets the Class Action
By Beth Graham - November 1, 2010
A forthcoming article entitled “The Litigation-Arbitration Dichotomy Meets the Class Action” by Vanderbilt Law Professor and Director of the Cecil D. Branstetter Litigation & Dispute Resolution Program Richard A. Nagareda makes some interesting and compelling arguments related to AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 09-893, a case set for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 9th. The article examines two cases from
Supreme Court Issues Orders on Special Master Interim Report
By Beth Graham - October 19, 2010
On October 12, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued orders in Montana v. Wyoming (No. 137, Original). The original jurisdiction water rights case was filed before the Court in early 2007 and subsequently transferred to a Special Master prior to the Court’s review. The October 12th orders resulted from Montana’s objections to an interim report issued by the Special Master in February. First, the Court ordered oral argument regarding whethe
Supreme Court News
By Beth Graham - October 7, 2010
The U.S. Supreme Court term is in full swing. Class-wide arbitration agreements have been a hot topic in the courts recently and the trend is continuing with the high court this fall. ADR news to note: Scheduled for November 9, 2010 Oral Argument AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 09-893: A class-wide arbitration case from the 9th Circuit asking the Court to consider whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts states from conditioning en
Article | Writing Arbitration Clauses After Rent-A-Center, West
By Victoria VanBuren - August 19, 2010
Allan Dinkoff from Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP wrote an interesting piece discussing arbitration clauses after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Rent-A-Center, West. Dinkoff suggests writing two arbitration clauses in employment agreements: The lessons to employers and others is clear. The agreement to arbitrate should contain two separate clauses, which should be made clearly independent. The first clause should contain the agreement to arbitra
Article | Unresolved Questions in the Wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Class Arbitration Ruling in Stolt-Nielsen v. AnimalFeeds International
By Victoria VanBuren - August 16, 2010
We came across the article Unresolved Questions in the Wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Class Arbitration Ruling in Stolt-Nielsen v. AnimalFeeds International, by Robert E. Crotty from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP. Here is an excerpt: The U.S. Supreme Court’s April 27 ruling in Stolt-Nielsen v. AnimalFeeds Int’l. (No. 08-1198), leaves numerous questions unanswered, says attorney Robert E. Crotty in this BNA Insight. The five-justice majority rule
Rent-A-Center, West Inc. v. Jackson | Blawgosphere Roundup on Arbitration Unconscionability Decision
By Victoria VanBuren - July 12, 2010
On June 21, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Rent-A-Center, West v. Jackson. The question presented was: Is the district court required in all cases to determine claims that an arbitration agreement subject to the Federal Arbitration Act (”FAA”) is unconscionable, even when the parties to the contract have clearly and unmistakably assigned this “gateway” issue to the arbitrator for decision? We thought you would like to read some interesting
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy