• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (312) 705-9317

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. Supreme Court Remands Class Arbitration Waiver Case

By Victoria VanBuren - November 23, 2011
On November 14, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court remanded Branch Banking and Trust v. Gordon for the Eleventh Circuit to reconsider its decision in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U. S. ___ (2011). In Gordon v. Branch Banking & Trust, 419 Fed. Appx. 920 (11th Cir. Fla. 2011) the Eleventh Circuit had ruled that an arbitration provision in a consumer checking account agreement was unenforceable because the arbitration provisionR

Continue reading...

KPMG LLP v Cocchi | U.S. Supreme Court Holds that a Court May Not Deny Arbitration When Some of the Claims Are Nonarbitrable

By Victoria VanBuren - November 14, 2011
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court held that courts must enforce arbitration agreements even if the plaintiff’s Complaint contains nonarbitrable claims. In KPMG LLP v. Cocchi, 565 U.S. ___ ( 2011) the Fourth District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida upheld a trial court’s refusal to compel arbitration in a lawsuit involving claims brought against the auditing firm KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) by investors owners of a limited pa

Continue reading...

U.S. Supreme Court Rules on KPMG LLP v. Cocchi

By Victoria VanBuren - November 7, 2011
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion on KPMG, LLP v. Cocchi et al., 565 U. S. ____ (2011). Background and holding are as follows: In this case the Fourth District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida upheld a trial court’s refusal to compel arbitration of respondents’ claims after determining that two of the four claims in a complaint were nonarbitrable.Though the matter is not altogether free from doubt, a fair reading of the opin

Continue reading...

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Cert to Nafta Traders v. Quinn

By Victoria VanBuren - October 24, 2011
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert to Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn, 339 S.W.3d 84 (Tex. 2011). In Nafta Traders, the Texas Supreme Court had held that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) did not preempt enforcement of an agreement for expanded judicial review of an arbitration award enforceable under the Texas Arbitration Act (“TAA”). Such enforcement was consistent with the FAA’s purpose of ensuring that

Continue reading...

CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood | Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments

By Victoria VanBuren - October 17, 2011
Last week, the U. S. Supreme Court heard arguments on CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood, 563 U.S. _ (2011). The question presented is whether claims arising under the Credit Repair Organizations Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1679 et seq., are subject to arbitration pursuant to a valid arbitration agreement. Find the transcript of the arguments here. Greenwood v. CompuCredit Corp., 615 F.3d 1204, 1205 (9th Cir. 2010) (opinion below) is here and Docket 10-948 is h

Continue reading...

U.S. Supreme Court Vacates Class Arbitration Decision | Fensterstock v. Education Finance Partners

By Victoria VanBuren - June 14, 2011
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. v. Fensterstock, No. 09-1562-cv. In Fensterstock v. Education Finance Partners, Inc., No. 08-CV-3622, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30457 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York had held that an arbitration agreement containing a class action waiver within a student loan promissory note is unconscionable and unenforceable as a

Continue reading...

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Cert to Arbitration Case

By Victoria VanBuren - May 17, 2011
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari (No. 10-1213) to Trustmark Ins. Co. v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co., 631 F.3d 869 ( 7th Cir. 2011). The Seventh Circuit had held that an arbitration panel has authority to determine what a confidentiality agreement requires, when the agreement was closely related to an insurance arbitration that was already underway. The questions presented to the U.S. Supreme Court were: May a party be compelled

Continue reading...

AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion | Blawgosphere Round-up on Class Arbitration Decision

By Victoria VanBuren - May 5, 2011
On April 27, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. The question presented was whether the FAA prohibits states from conditioning the enforceability of certain arbitration agreements on the availability of class-wide arbitration procedures. We thought you would like to read some interesting commentary about the opinion: AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion: FAA preempts rule that makes class action waivers in ar

Continue reading...

U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari to Consumer Arbitration Case

By Victoria VanBuren - May 4, 2011
On May 2, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to yet another consumer arbitration case, CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood, No. 10-948. In Greenwood, the Ninth Circuit decided whether the word “sue,” as used in the Credit Repair Organization Act (“CROA”) means “arbitrate.” The court concluded that Congress meant what it said in using the term “sue,” and that it did not mean “arbitrate.” The Supreme Court is expected to resolve a spit betwe

Continue reading...

GUEST-POST PART II | AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion and the Bright Side of the Force

By Victoria VanBuren - May 2, 2011
By James M. Gaitis [See Part I here. ] Because the only valid grounds for vacatur now recognized by the Supreme Court are those grounds found in Section 10 of the FAA, the above statements by the Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility show that the Court in effect was stating that an arbitral failure to at least attempt to apply the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the Court’s hypothetical example would constitute either “misbehavior&#

Continue reading...

« First‹ Previous67891011121314Next ›Last »

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy