Menu
Texas Supreme Court
GUEST-POST | Texas Supreme Court Compels Arbitration in Slip and Fall at Hospice
By Victoria VanBuren - May 10, 2010
By Glen M. Wilkerson Last Friday, the Texas Supreme Court handed down another arbitration case in In Re Odyssey Healthcare. P worked at hospice. She had employment agreement with non-subscriber (no worker’s compensation) that included an arbitration provision. She slipped at the home of a patient. P lived and accident occurred in El Paso. The Arbitration language provided: Panel of arbitrators would be from Dallas County. The Court compelle
A Case that Has Gone Through Litigation, Arbitration, and Mediation: Cull and Cull v. Perry Homes
By Victoria VanBuren - April 24, 2010
It has been a long road for Mr. and Mrs. Cull. Here are the facts of the case: In 1996, the Culls bought a home from home builder Perry Homes and warranties from Home Owners Multiple Equity, Inc. and Warranty Underwriters Insurance Company. In 2000, the Culls sued the warranty companies over problems with their house foundation and construction. They claimed that their home had defects that caused its appraised value to plummet from more than $23
Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Appeals Under the Texas Arbitration Act
By Victoria VanBuren - March 26, 2010
The Texas Supreme Court held that the Texas General Arbitration Act (TAA) allows an appeal from a trial court’s order that denies confirmation of an arbitration award and instead, vacates the award and directs that the dispute be arbitrated anew. Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the court, in which Justice O’Neill, Justice Wainwright, Justice Johnson, Justice Willett, and Justice Guzman joined. Justice Willett filed a concurring opinion. Ch
2009 Arbitration Case Law: Texas Supreme Court
By Victoria VanBuren - December 9, 2009
Continuing with our 2009 Year-End Highlights series, we present today a summary of noteworthy arbitration opinions handed down by the Texas Supreme Court. The landmark case In re Poly-America, L.P. , 262 S.W.3d 337 (Tex. 2008) decided in 2008, involves a retaliatory-discharge claim. The court concluded that fee-splitting schemes in an arbitration agreement are unconscionable. (post available here) In February, the court decided three arbitration-
Texas Supreme Court Compels Nonsignatories to Arbitrate Wrongful Death Claims
By Victoria VanBuren - December 2, 2009
In re Golden Peanut Co., (Texas 2009) (No. 09-0122) deals with family members who brought a wrongful death action against Grant Drennan’s employer, Golden Peanut Company, LLC. (“Golden Peanut”). Golden Peanut did not subscribe to worker’s compensation insurance, but provided an Employee Injury Benefit Plan which called for binding arbitration of employment-related claims. Golden Peanut filed a motion to compel arbitration.
Texas Supreme Court Compels Arbitration of Employment Discrimination Claims
By Victoria VanBuren - November 10, 2009
The Supreme Court of Texas held that an agreement to arbitrate discrimination claims between an employee and a staffing agency hired by the employer survives the dissolution of the contract between the staffing agency and employer. In the present case, In re Polymerica, __S.W.3d __ (Tex. 2009) (No. 08-1064), Polymerica, L.L.C. d.b.a Global Enterprises, Inc. (“Global”), a manufacture of plastics, hired Angelica Soltero in 1998. In 2002, Global con
Texas Supreme Court: Insurance Coverage Dispute Involving a $1.5 Million Arbitration Award
By Victoria VanBuren - November 5, 2009
Within the five opinions released by the Texas Supreme Court on October 30, Chrysler Insurance Co. v. Greenspoint Dodge of Houston, Inc., (Texas 2009) (No. 08?0780) caught our attention. The case deals with a dispute over insurance coverage to pay for a $1.5 million defamation arbitration award granted to Noe Martinez, a former employee of Greenspoint. The award was confirmed by a district court in Harris County back in 2002. See Martinez. v. Gre
Texas Supreme Court Hears Case on Standards of Judicial Review for Arbitration Awards After Hall Street
By Victoria VanBuren - October 8, 2009
As reported by the Texas Supreme Court Blog (thanks for the cite!) the Texas Supreme Court heard arguments today on the case NAFTA Traders, Inc. v. Margaret A. Quinn; from Dallas County; 5th district (05?07?00340?CV, 257 SW3d 795, 06?17?08). NAFTA Traders appeals the confirmation of an arbitral award in favor of Margaret Quinn in a sexual discrimination case under the Texas General Arbitration Act (TAA). The Dallas Court of Appeals relying on the
Texas Supreme Court Finds that Court Abused Its Discretion by Allowing Pre-Arbitration Discovery
By Victoria VanBuren - July 21, 2009
The Supreme Court of Texas held that a court abused its discretion by permitting discovery instead of deciding a motion to compel arbitration. In re Houston Pipe Line Co., __S.W.3d __ (Texas 2009) (No. 08-0800) involves a gas purchase agreement between Houston Pipe Line Company, L.P. and O’Connor & Hewitt, Ltd. The agreement was based on the Houston Ship Channel Price Index (the “Index”) and contained the following arbitrati
Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on In re Morgan Stanley
By Victoria VanBuren - July 15, 2009
Professor Alan Scott Rau has forwarded us the following comments relating to our post of yesterday, in which we summarized the recent Texas Supreme Court case of In re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., __ S.W.3d __ (Texas 2009) (No. 07-0665). The Texas Supreme Court gets it absolutely right [and totally without regard to the fact that they quote me.] How could it be otherwise? Compare Justice Hecht’s dissent: “A raving lunatic in a stra
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy