• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Court Decisions about Arbitration

International Arbitration & Federal Court Jurisdiction

By Rob Hargrove - August 19, 2006
On Thursday, the Fifth Circuit handed down an opinion in a complicated case (link is to .pdf of opinion) which implicates, in part, the Federal Arbitration Act, to the extent it codifies the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (we blogged on the New York Convention and its roots back in June). In any event, while Thursday’s case is not really about arbitration, an international arbitration is at

Continue reading...

Sovereign Immunity in Texas

By Rob Hargrove - June 30, 2006
Well, this morning’s Texas law explosion is explained in large part by a tremendously important sovereign immunity opinion the Texas Supreme Court handed down. The opinion reverses a 1970 Texas Supreme Court and holds that the “sue and be sued” language that shows up all the time in City charters and statutes and the like may not in fact be construed as a waiver of sovereign immunity from suit. The opinion also notes that the Le

Continue reading...

No, You May Not Contest an Order Granting Arbitration

By Rob Hargrove - June 30, 2006
The Texas Supreme Court ruled this morning to clarify that mandamus review is not necessarily available of an order granting a motion to compel arbitration when the underlying litigation is stayed rather than dismissed. According to the Court, one can only seek review of an order granting arbitration when the evidence shows “clearly and indisputably that the district court did not have the discretion to stay the proceedings pending arbitrat

Continue reading...

Door Knobs, Factual Disputes & Arbitration

By Rob Hargrove - June 30, 2006
This morning, the Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion compelling arbitration of certain claims asserted by the Brownsville Independent School District against an air conditioning company relating to the construction of a school. The Court starts its opinion by clarifying the relationship between the FAA and the TAA in Texas courts. So long as state law does not conflict with the FAA to the extent state law would preclude arbitration (such as in

Continue reading...

Texas Law Explosion

By Rob Hargrove - June 30, 2006
The Texas Supreme Court issued twenty-five opinions this morning. That’s right. Twenty-five. At least two are arbitration-related, so we’ll handle those first. After that, I’m not sure what we’ll do, since a 25 opinion day is unprecedented in the history of this blog. Technorati Tags: litigation, Texas Supreme Court, law

Continue reading...

Texas Supreme Court send Peterbilt Employee to Arbitration

By Rob Hargrove - June 19, 2006
The Texas Supreme Court has again, via mandamus, overturned a Court of Appeals affirmation of a trial court denial of a motion to compel arbitration. This most recent opinion stems from the Peterbilt Company’s employment forms. The opinion is unremarkable, but it does specify that an employee’s having signed an “acknowledgment” form (i.e. “I acknowledge that I have received the arbitration policy”) is evidence

Continue reading...

Texas Supreme Court Rejects More Arguments Against Arbitration

By Rob Hargrove - June 9, 2006
The Texas Supreme Court just issued another decision in the law governing agreements to arbitrate, once again granting mandamus in order to force a case into arbitration. The opinion addresses several of the “hot” issues often raised by parties seeking to avoid arbitration, although perhaps these issues are cooling at this point. The Ripple Family entered into an agreement with a Retailer to purchase a manufactured home. The agreement

Continue reading...

I Missed One

By Rob Hargrove - June 1, 2006
Yesterday, the Workplace Prof Blog pointed out in a post that the Fifth Circuit had issued an opinion, back on May 18, 2006, in which it refused to compel arbitration (link is to .pdf file of the opinion). Obviously, this is a big deal and an unusual event in the Circuit, so apologies for us having missed the opinion. The reason for the omission, for the curious, is the Court’s decision to not publish the opinion. We are frankly not as dili

Continue reading...

5th Circuit Reverses Arbitration Vacatur

By Rob Hargrove - May 30, 2006
The Fifth Circuit handed down an opinion (link is to .pdf) today which discusses the qualifications required of a “non-public” arbitrator under the NASD rules. The opinion reverses a trial court decision to vacate an arbitral award on the basis that one of the three arbitrators did not meed NASD standards for arbitrator qualifications. In big cases arbitrated under the NASD rules, a panel of three arbitrators is required, two of whom

Continue reading...

Order Compelling Arbitration Final and Appealable

By Rob Hargrove - May 30, 2006
On Friday, the Texas Supreme Court confirmed that Texas law is in line with Federal law holding that a trial court’s order compelling arbitration is final and appealable, and not interlocutory. The opinion is short and provides little in the way of opportunity for pithy commentary, but is useful nonetheless. Childers v. Advanced Foundation Repair, Cause No. 05-0831 Technorati Tags: arbitration, ADR, Texas Supreme Court, law

Continue reading...

« First‹ Previous6869707172737475Next ›

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy