Menu
Court Decisions about Arbitration
Fifth Circuit Confirms Credit Card Dispute Award by the National Arbitration Forum
By Victoria VanBuren - October 20, 2009
In Theriault v. FIA Card Services, N.A., No. 09-30233 (5th Cir. Oct. 8, 2009), Victor Theriault became delinquent on his credit card account with FIA Card Services, N.A. (formerly known as MBNA America Bank, N.A.) (FIA) around December 2006. FIA filed for arbitration at the National Arbitration Forum (NAF). On April 2007 NAF issued an arbitration award in favor of FIA. Theriault challenged the award on the grounds that FIA had violated the Truth
Texas Supreme Court Hears Case on Standards of Judicial Review for Arbitration Awards After Hall Street
By Victoria VanBuren - October 8, 2009
As reported by the Texas Supreme Court Blog (thanks for the cite!) the Texas Supreme Court heard arguments today on the case NAFTA Traders, Inc. v. Margaret A. Quinn; from Dallas County; 5th district (05?07?00340?CV, 257 SW3d 795, 06?17?08). NAFTA Traders appeals the confirmation of an arbitral award in favor of Margaret Quinn in a sexual discrimination case under the Texas General Arbitration Act (TAA). The Dallas Court of Appeals relying on the
Michigan Journal of International Law Article on Class Action Arbitration
By Victoria VanBuren - September 23, 2009
Professor S.I. Strong, Senior Fellow at the University of Missouri’s Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution wrote an excellent article about the international implications of class arbitration. The article is entitled “The Sounds of Silence: Are U.S. Arbitrators Creating Internationally Enforceable Awards When Ordering Class Arbitration in Cases of Contractual Silence or Ambiguity?” and appears at 30 Michigan Journal of Inte
GUEST-POST PART IVB | Class and Consolidated Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act: What Issues Will the United States Supreme Court Confront in Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. V. AnimalFeeds Int’l Co.?
By Victoria VanBuren - September 21, 2009
Part IVB: How will the Court Rule on the Merits? By Philip J. Loree Jr. I. Introduction In Part IVA (here) we considered whether the question in Stolt-Nielsen was one for the court or the arbitrators to decide, and predicted that at least five Justices of the United States Supreme Court will hold that the court must decide it. If we are correct, then the Supreme Court will consider on a de novo basis whether the arbitration panel had the authorit
Jones v. Halliburton: Fifth Circuit Rules on Arbitration of Tort Claims by an Employee
By Victoria VanBuren - September 18, 2009
[Ed. note: see our previous posts about this case here and here.] The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that claims for (1) assault and battery; (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (3) negligent hiring, retention and supervision of employees involved in a sexual assault; and (4) false imprisonment are not related to the plaintiff’s employment contract and refused to compel arbitration. I. Background In
GUEST-POST PART IVA | Class and Consolidated Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act: What Issues Will the United States Supreme Court Confront in Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. V. AnimalFeeds Int’l Co.?
By Victoria VanBuren - September 1, 2009
Part IVA: Who Decides? By Philip J. Loree Jr. I. Introduction In Part III (here) we examined the background of Stolt-Nielsen and identified four issues that the United States Supreme Court will likely confront when it decides the case. In this part IVA we consider the first issue: Who decides whether class arbitration can be imposed on the parties when their arbitration agreements are silent on that point? Put differently, is the question one of
Fifth Circuit Decides on Waiver of Removal Rights Under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
By Victoria VanBuren - August 25, 2009
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a contract containing a choice of law and forum clause effectively waives the right to remove to federal court under the New York Convention. In ENSCO International Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s et. al. (No. 08-10451) (5th Cir. Aug. 12, 2009), plaintiff ENSCO International, Inc. is an offshore drilling oil and gas company and defendants are several insurance underw
Fifth Circuit Rules on Section 1782 Discovery Motion for International Arbitration Case
By Victoria VanBuren - August 18, 2009
In an unpublished opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that section 1782 does not apply for a discovery motion for use in a private international arbitration. In El Paso Corporation v. La Comision Ejecutiva, (No. 08-20771) (5th Cir. Aug. 6, 2009), La Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica Del Rio Lempa (“CEL”) is a state-owned utility company in El Salvador and Nejapa Power Company (“NPC”) is a
GUEST-POST PART III | Class and Consolidated Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act: What Issues Will the United States Supreme Court Confront in Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. V. AnimalFeeds Int’l Co.?
By Victoria VanBuren - August 17, 2009
Part III: Background and Procedural History of the Stolt-Nielsen Case By Philip J. Loree Jr. Introduction Back when the buzz about Stolt-Nielsen focused on how the court breathed new life into the “manifest disregard of the law” standard, the facts of the case were not nearly as important as its discussion of the law. Ordinarily, though, the practice of law is the practice of facts, and as respects the question whether the Second Circuit’s holdin
Professor Alan Scott Rau Comments on Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Co.
By Victoria VanBuren - August 10, 2009
Professor Alan Scott Rau, from The University of Texas School of Law, has made the following comments regarding our recent posts on Stolt-Nielsen (see posts Part I, Part II, and Part III). I ‘m afraid I just can’t understand all this talk about “silence,” and I could use some help here. Contracts very often expressly address a problem—in which case courts have the task of “interpreting” just what they said. But often there will be no express prov
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy