• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Bicyclist Armstrong Appeals Arbitration Panel’s Decision to Supreme Court of Texas

0
by Beth Graham

Sunday, May 04, 2014


Tweet

On Friday, former professional bicyclist Lance Armstrong asked the Supreme Court of Texas to overturn a Dallas arbitration panel’s decision to reconsider a 2005 arbitration settlement in his favor.   The case arose out of a dispute between Armstrong and Dallas-based SCA Promotions over bonuses paid to the athlete in connection with his seven Tour de France wins.  During the arbitral proceedings, Armstrong reportedly stated under oath that he never used performance enhancing drugs (PEDs).  Pursuant to the parties’ arbitration settlement, Armstrong received about $12 million from SCA Promotions.

Last year, SCA Promotions sought to reopen the arbitration case after Armstrong publicly admitted to using PEDs throughout his career.  Although the original three-person arbitral panel agreed to revisit the dispute, Armstrong’s attorneys claim such a move violates Texas law.  Thus far, Texas courts have refused to stop the panel from reopening the case.  It will be interesting to see whether the Texas Supreme Court agrees to hear Armstrong’s appeal.

Related Posts

  • Arbitral Panel Issues $10 Million Award Against Disgraced Bicyclist Lance ArmstrongArbitral Panel Issues $10 Million Award Against Disgraced Bicyclist Lance Armstrong
  • Texas Supreme Court Denies Armstrong’s Writ of Mandamus PetitionTexas Supreme Court Denies Armstrong’s Writ of Mandamus Petition
  • Texas Supreme Court Holds Agreement to Arbitrate is Not Substantively Unconscionable Despite Unenforceable ProvisionsTexas Supreme Court Holds Agreement to Arbitrate is Not Substantively Unconscionable Despite Unenforceable Provisions
  • Armstrong Lawyers Claim $12 Million Arbitration Case is ClosedArmstrong Lawyers Claim $12 Million Arbitration Case is Closed
  • Armstrong Seeks to Avoid Review of 2006 Arbitration SettlementArmstrong Seeks to Avoid Review of 2006 Arbitration Settlement
  • Texas Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Involving Arbitrator DisqualificationTexas Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Involving Arbitrator Disqualification

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy