In an opinion (link is to .pdf file) filed Wednesday, the Fifth Circuit affirmed a trial court decision to confirm an arbitral award which contained a punitive damages award for the arbitral plaintiff. The case involved a woman’s breach of fiduciary duty claims against the managers of an investment portfolio she received as part of a divorce settlement. The arbitral panel found that the investment company did in fact breach its duty to the

Continue reading...

The Texas Supreme Court ruled this morning that Texans did not acquire the right to privately invoke the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) until the Texas Legislature amended the Business & Commerce Code to allow Texas court to hear private suits based on the TCPA on September 1, 1999. The TCPA, which was passed in 1991, allowed individuals to sue companies that send unsolicited facsimile advertisements “if

Continue reading...

This morning, the Third Court of Appeals affirmed a Travis County trial court decision to grant a summary judgment in favor of the Comptroller’s office in a putative class action case which alleged that the Comptroller’s failure to pay interest on property returned to Texans under the Unclaimed Property Act constituted a taking. While the court’s analysis of the Unclaimed Property Act is perhaps not of general interest, the opin

Continue reading...

This morning, the Texas Supreme Court issued a mandamus opinion in an arbitration case holding that a fired worker’s defamation claim against her erstwhile employer was subject to an arbitration agreement, which required arbitration of personal injury claims. According to the Court, since the agreement was susceptible to two reasonable interpretations, one holding that defamation is a personal injury and one holding that it is not, arbitrat

Continue reading...

As you may or may not recall, we discussed the doctrine of McCarran-Ferguson Reverse Preemption some time ago and noted that it was working its way through the Texas Courts of Appeals. This past week (on January 11 actually), the Fifth Circuit weighed in, affirming a trial court denial of a motion to compel arbitration on McCarran Ferguson grounds. Under Mississippi law, an uninsured motorist automobile insurance policy cannot require arbitration

Continue reading...

On Friday, the Third Court of Appeals handed down an opinion on a petition for writ of mandamus holding that a Burnet County judge abused his discretion in failing to compel arbitration of a breach of contract claim brought by a partner and his wife against a partnership. The Court held that, under Federal Arbitration Act analysis, Texas law governs questions of whether a valid arbitration clause exists and whether the claims asserted fall within

Continue reading...

Yesterday, the Fifth Ciruit Court of Appeals handed down an opinion affirming a decision from the Northern District of Texas to vacate an arbitral award where the single arbitrator failed to disclose that he had worked with one of the attorneys in the case on a large piece of patent litigation in the 1990s. The arbitrator and the attorney in question were two of thirty-four lawyers representing Intel in the prior case over the course of several y

Continue reading...

On Wednesday, The Third Court of Appeals issued an opinion overturning a trial court summary judgment and rendering judgment in a case which involved the calculation of royalty fees under an oil and gas lease. Cause No. 03-04-00820-CV, Tana Oil & Gas Corp. v. Cernosek, et al.

Continue reading...

Yesterday, the Third Court of Appeals handed down two memorandum opinions. The first discussed a deferred ajudication of a truancy charge. Cause No. 03-03-00253-CV, Jim Walden v. Rex Baker, Justice of the Peace, Precinct 4, Hays County Yesterday’s other memorandum opinion affirms a trial court judgment dismissing a declaratory judgment action which sought to invalidate Austin’s new smoking ordinance. The VFW, which operates bingo hall

Continue reading...

The Texas Supreme Court issued two per curiam opinions this morning. The first invoked Rule 47.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and remanded a case back to the 11th Court of Appeals. The Court found that the Court of Appeals’ opinion “failed to identify and expressly consider modification and waiver as distinct issues associated with the relief the parties requested from the arbitrator” and remanded the case for furth

Continue reading...