• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Austin Police Department Now Allows Mediation of Citizen Complaints

0
by Beth Graham

Friday, Mar 29, 2013


Tweet

Alternative dispute resolution methods are increasingly being utilized across a wide range of industries. According to a recent news report, the Austin Police Department has instituted a new policy that provides area citizens with the opportunity to engage in mediation with law enforcement officers following a complaint. Under the policy, less serious external complaints such as allegations of inadequate service and rude officers may be mediated in lieu of a formal internal affairs investigation. Before mediation may occur, however, both the police officer and the individual who filed the complaint must agree to participate. In addition, mediation must be approved by a police commander or internal affairs officer.

Wayne Vincent, Austin Police Association President, expressed his support for the new policy. He stated listening to the perspective of others through a confidential mediation is healthy for both police officers and citizens. Police Monitor Margo Frasier also reportedly supports providing citizens and police officers with the option to consider mediation following a poor initial interaction. Julie O’Brien, Commander of the Austin Police Department’s Professional Standards Division, stated she prefers to address conflict through the mediation process. O’Brien also added, “I think it’s of tremendous value in types of cases where it’s appropriate.” Although not yet widely used, the first mediation since the policy was established took place last month. Once mediation occurs, the formal complaint process against an officer is officially ended.

What are your thoughts on the new policy?

Related Posts

  • SXSW 2016 PanelPicker Voting Has Begun!SXSW 2016 PanelPicker Voting Has Begun!
  • Symposium | Arbitrators and National Courts: Conflict and Cooperation | Houston, May 13-14Symposium | Arbitrators and National Courts: Conflict and Cooperation | Houston, May 13-14
  • Individualized Injunctions and No-Modification Terms: Challenging ‘Anti-Reform’ Provisions in Arbitration ClausesIndividualized Injunctions and No-Modification Terms: Challenging ‘Anti-Reform’ Provisions in Arbitration Clauses
  • What’s the right way to do discovery for securities arbitration?What’s the right way to do discovery for securities arbitration?
  • International Implications of the Will as an Implied Unilateral Arbitration ContractInternational Implications of the Will as an Implied Unilateral Arbitration Contract
  • Article | The Arbitration Fairness Index: Using a Public Rating System to Skirt the Legal Logjam and Promote Fairer and More Effective Arbitration of Employment and Consumer DisputesArticle | The Arbitration Fairness Index: Using a Public Rating System to Skirt the Legal Logjam and Promote Fairer and More Effective Arbitration of Employment and Consumer Disputes

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy