• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (312) 705-9317

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Article | What Constitutes an ‘Agreement in Writing’ in International Commercial Arbitration? Conflicts Between the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012


Tweet

Professor S.I. Strong (University of Missouri School of Law) has published “What Constitutes an ‘Agreement in Writing’ in International Commercial Arbitration? Conflicts Between the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act,” 48 Stanford Journal of International Law 47 (2012).

The abstract is:

This Article investigates whether and to what extent a party must produce
an “agreement in writing” when seeking to enforce an international
arbitration agreement or award in a U.S. federal court. This issue has
recently given rise to both a circuit split and a petition for certiorari to the
U.S. Supreme Court, and involves matters of formal validity as well as federal
subject matter jurisdiction. The problem arises out of subtle differences in the
way an “agreement in writing” is defined in the Federal Arbitration Act
(FAA) and the 1958 United Nations Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention).

This is not just a U.S. problem, however. Questions relating to form
requirements under the New York Convention have also been much discussed
at the international level, with UNCITRAL recently issuing a formal
recommendation on how to deal with the problem.

This Article describes the scope of the current problems associated with
form requirements, including how inconsistencies in domestic practice affect
international commercial arbitration and global trade. After discussing the
difficulties in both the U.S. and the international sphere, the Article makes a
number of suggestions for legislative and judicial reform. This is the first
article to discuss the circuit split and associated issues in the context of the
FAA and to take a serious comparative look at the implementation of the
UNCITRAL recommendation at the international level.

The full article may be downloaded here. Other scholarly papers by Professor S.I. Strong are here.

Related Posts

  • Constitutional, Treaty and Statutory Interpretation in International Commercial ArbitrationConstitutional, Treaty and Statutory Interpretation in International Commercial Arbitration
  • 2012 Year-End Highlights2012 Year-End Highlights
  • AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion | Blawgosphere Round-up on Class Arbitration Decision AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion | Blawgosphere Round-up on Class Arbitration Decision
  • U.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert in Arbitration Case, Denies AnotherU.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert in Arbitration Case, Denies Another
  • U.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert to Stolt-Nielsen: Class Action Arbitration CaseU.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert to Stolt-Nielsen: Class Action Arbitration Case
  • How the Supreme Court’s Misconstruction of the FAA Has Affected ConsumersHow the Supreme Court’s Misconstruction of the FAA Has Affected Consumers

Like this article? Share it!


  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy