• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Article | Empowering Settlors: How Proper Language Can Increase the Enforceability of a Mandatory Arbitration Provision in a Trust

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Wednesday, May 09, 2012


Tweet

In a new article, Empowering Settlors: How Proper Language Can Increase the Enforceability of a Mandatory Arbitration Provision in a Trust, forthcoming in REAL PROPERTY, TRUST AND ESTATE LAW JOURNAL, available now in SSRN, Professor S.I. Strong discusses the increasingly important topic of trust arbitration. Here is the abstract:

With hostile trust litigation reaching epidemic proportions, many people within the trust industry are interested in identifying new and less expensive ways to resolve trust-related disputes. Arbitration is often proposed as a possible alternative, although questions exist about whether and to what extent a mandatory arbitration provision found in a trust will be considered enforceable by a court.

Up until now, most commentary in this area of law has focused on purely jurisprudential issues, with little attention being paid to the practical efforts that settlors can make to increase the enforceability of arbitration provisions found in trusts. This Article takes a slightly different approach to the question of trust arbitration in that it analyzes the extent to which a settlor can overcome the various legal challenges facing mandatory trust arbitration through appropriate use of language in the trust.

In so doing, this Article not only discusses the opinions of both courts and commentators, it also analyzes the effectiveness of various model arbitration clauses specially drafted by two of the world’s leading arbitral institutions, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), for use in trusts. Although these provisions have been in existence since 2003 and 2008 respectively, no commentator has yet discussed them in any depth. This Article fills that gap, providing settlors and trustees with practical, yet theoretically sound, advice on how to draft an enforceable arbitration provision in a trust. In so doing, the Article also introduces a number of relevant judicial opinions that have not yet entered the legal literature.

The full article can be downloaded (for free) here. Other papers by Professor S.I. Strong are here.

Related Posts

  • Class Action Waivers in Employment Contracts: The Clash between the National Labor Relations Act and the Federal Arbitration ActClass Action Waivers in Employment Contracts: The Clash between the National Labor Relations Act and the Federal Arbitration Act
  • Texas Supreme Court Finds Arbitration Clause in Attorney-Client Contract Was Not Unconscionable, Against Public Policy or IllusoryTexas Supreme Court Finds Arbitration Clause in Attorney-Client Contract Was Not Unconscionable, Against Public Policy or Illusory
  • The Will as an Implied Unilateral Arbitration ContractThe Will as an Implied Unilateral Arbitration Contract
  • EnergyBuzz: Arbitration for Energy DisputesEnergyBuzz: Arbitration for Energy Disputes
  • New AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules are Now in EffectNew AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules are Now in Effect
  • Fifth Circuit Holds Arbitration Provision Included in Employee Handbook is Illusory and Unenforceable Under Texas LawFifth Circuit Holds Arbitration Provision Included in Employee Handbook is Illusory and Unenforceable Under Texas Law

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy