• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Article | Class Arbitration Outside the United States: Reading the Tea Leaves

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Nov 23, 2010


Tweet

A new paper is available from S.I Strong, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri and contributor to this blog, entitled Class Arbitration Outside the United States: Reading the Tea Leaves. The paper was initially presented at the International Chamber of Commerce’s (ICC) Thirtieth Anniversary Annual Meeting on Multiparty Arbitration, held last December in Paris. The finished work appears in Dossier VII: Arbitration and Multiparty Contracts, published earlier this year by the ICC Institute of World Business Law.

Here is the abstract:

This draft paper, which is expected to be published in 2010 by the ICC Institute of World Business Law in Dossier VII – Multiparty Arbitration, discusses the question of whether and to what extent class arbitration (also known as class action arbitration) will expand beyond the borders of the United States and the ways in which the device might change to suit the needs of different legal systems. In so doing, the paper discusses recent empirical evidence involving the increasing availability of collective relief in the judicial context in systems around the world and argues that courts, arbitrators and parties outside the United States are unlikely to adopt the U.S. model of class arbitration but will instead create into a new form of multiparty arbitration that is more appropriately termed “collective arbitration,” due to anticipated similarities to various forms of collective redress in different legal systems. The discussion also considers the policy rationales affecting the decision to create or utilize a form of collective arbitration as well as the theoretical debates that affect the expansion of class or collective arbitration into new jurisdictions.

The paper is available without charge from Social Science Research Network and may be read here. Other papers by Professor Strong can be found here.

Last week, Disputing posted here about an international class arbitration article recently written by Professor Strong, From Class to Collective: The De-Americanization of Class Arbitration.

Technorati Tags: ADR, law, arbitration

Related Posts

  • Article | From Class to Collective: The De-Americanization of Class Arbitration Article | From Class to Collective: The De-Americanization of Class Arbitration
  • Law Review Article | Does Class Arbitration ‘Change the Nature’ of Arbitration? Stolt-Nielsen and First PrinciplesLaw Review Article | Does Class Arbitration ‘Change the Nature’ of Arbitration? Stolt-Nielsen and First Principles
  • Incentives for Large-Scale Arbitration: How Policymakers Can Influence Party BehaviourIncentives for Large-Scale Arbitration: How Policymakers Can Influence Party Behaviour
  • Use and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and ConciliationUse and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and Conciliation
  • U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Consider Class Arbitration AppealU.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Consider Class Arbitration Appeal
  • Collective Consumer Arbitration in Spain: A Civil Law Response to U.S.-Style Class ArbitrationCollective Consumer Arbitration in Spain: A Civil Law Response to U.S.-Style Class Arbitration

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy