• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Arbitrator Intelligence: From Intuition to Data in Arbitrator Appointments

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Feb 12, 2018


Tweet

Catherine A. Rogers, Professor of Law at Penn State Law and Professor of Ethics, Regulation, and the Rule of Law at Queen Mary, University of London, has published “Arbitrator Intelligence: From Intuition to Data in Arbitrator Appointments,” New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer Volume 11 No. 2 (Spring 2018). In her essay, Professor Rogers discusses using data gathered using the Arbitrator Intelligence Questionnaire to select neutrals.

Here is the abstract:

In virtually every sector of modern business, data is enhancing if not replacing intuition as the basis for making decisions. This trend holds even for assessments as seemingly subjective and rarified as predicting the quality—and hence price—of an exquisite French Bordeaux.

In selecting international arbitrators, however, intuition still predominates.

“Expertise” and “efficiency” are identified as the key features parties are looking for in an international arbitrator, but they are not easy to measure or quantify. Expertise and efficiency are not credentials that are listed on arbitrators’ CVs, but are instead cumulative, largely intuitive assessments that are drawn from a number of sources and metrics, which may vary from case to case depending on a client’s needs. The sources and metrics, meanwhile, are typically collected through ad hoc individual phone calls.

This Essay describes how Arbitrator Intelligence (AI) seeks to solve these problems by bringing data-driven analysis to arbitrator appointments. The means to these ends is the recently launched Arbitrator Intelligence Questionnaire, or AIQ. The AIQ seeks to replicate, through systematically collected feedback, the same kinds of information currently sought through personal-to-person inquiries.

After providing an overview of the content and operation of the AIQ, the Essay then previews the means by which data collected through the AIQs will be made available: AI Reports. It explains how collected data will be analyzed and presented in sample graphs.

The Essay concludes by explaining how Arbitrator Intelligence will liberate arbitrator selection from the 19th Century’s telephone and introduce it to the 21st Century’s data-driven analytic solutions.

This and other articles written by Professor Rogers may be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit:  albertogp123 on Foter.com / CC BY

Related Posts

  • Does International Arbitration Enfeeble or Enhance Local Legal Institutions?Does International Arbitration Enfeeble or Enhance Local Legal Institutions?
  • International Arbitration, Judicial Education, and Legal ElitesInternational Arbitration, Judicial Education, and Legal Elites
  • Transparency in Arbitrator SelectionTransparency in Arbitrator Selection
  • Are Rules Allowing Arbitral Sanctions a Mirage?Are Rules Allowing Arbitral Sanctions a Mirage?
  • When Conflicts Polarize Communities: Designing Localized Offices that Intervene CollaborativelyWhen Conflicts Polarize Communities: Designing Localized Offices that Intervene Collaboratively
  • Mind the Gap: Bringing Technology to the Mediation TableMind the Gap: Bringing Technology to the Mediation Table

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy