• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: The Next Frontier for International Commercial Arbitration?

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Mar 13, 2018


Tweet

S.I. Strong, Manley O. Hudson Professor of Law at the University of Missouri School of Law, Senior Fellow at the Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, and Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University Law Center, has published “Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: The Next Frontier for International Commercial Arbitration?,” To be published in final form in ICCA Congress Series No. 20, “Evolution and Adaptation: The Future of International Arbitration” (Wolters Kluwer, 2019 Forthcoming); University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-14.  In her article, Professor Strong discusses recent developments in trust arbitration across the globe.

Here is the abstract:

Although so-called “external” trust disputes have long been subject to both national and international arbitration, recent years have seen increasing interest in “internal” trust arbitration, meaning proceedings that address matters involving trustees and/or beneficiaries. Unfortunately, experts in trust law seldom communicate with experts in arbitration law, which leads to a variety of problems as a matter of both law and policy. If trust arbitration is to flourish, individuals and institutions in both fields must work together to develop a mechanism that complies with the unique requirements of both bodies of law.

This Article outlines the importance of trusts in the global marketplace and introduces some of the key concepts and authorities relating to trust arbitration so that experts in international commercial arbitration can appreciate the special challenges in this area of law. In so doing, the Article considers recent legislative, judicial and institutional developments involving trust arbitration, including examples from Europe, Australasia and the Americas, and focuses on the particular problems associated with binding all necessary parties to the arbitration.

This and other academic works authored by Professor Strong are available for download without charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit: Foter.com

Related Posts

  • Applying the Lessons of International Commercial Arbitration to International Commercial Mediation: A Dispute System Design AnalysisApplying the Lessons of International Commercial Arbitration to International Commercial Mediation: A Dispute System Design Analysis
  • Beyond International Commercial Arbitration? the Promise of International Commercial MediationBeyond International Commercial Arbitration? the Promise of International Commercial Mediation
  • International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782
  • Collective Redress Arbitration in the European UnionCollective Redress Arbitration in the European Union
  • Anti-Suit Injunctions in Judicial and Arbitral Procedures in the United StatesAnti-Suit Injunctions in Judicial and Arbitral Procedures in the United States
  • Realizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial MediationRealizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial Mediation

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy