As reported this week by the Workplace Prof Blog, a U.S. District Court in Colorado has issued a decision involving arbitration of statutory claims within the context of a collective bargaining agreement. The case is Mathews v. Denver Newspaper Agency, LLP, 2009 WL 1231776 (D. Colo. 2009). Professor Richard Bales’ analysis of the decision is here: First Post-Pyett Case.
Previous Coverage:
- U.S. Supreme Court Enforces Agreement to Arbitrate Discrimination Claims (April 3, 2009)
- 14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett: Conflicts of Interest (April 6, 2009)
Related Posts:
- Pyett Analysis – Unions Can Waive But what is Clear and Unmistakable?, Sarah Cole, ADR Prof Blog, April 3, 2009.
- Supreme Court’s Decision in Pyett Collective Bargaining Case Will Have Little Real World Effect, George Lenard, JURIST- Hotline, April 5, 2009.
- Some Interesting Questions Raised by the Pyett Decision, Philip J. Loree Jr., Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum, April 7, 2009.
Technorati Tags:
arbitration, ADR, law, U.S. Supreme Court, ADE waiver, Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, National Labor Relations Act of 1935, 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett
Related Posts
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert in Arbitration Case, Denies Another
Article | Revelation and Reaction: The Struggle to Shape American Arbitration
2009 Arbitration Case Law: U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Supreme Court Vacates Sixth Circuit Decision that Nonsignatories May not Enforce Arbitration Agreement
14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett: Conflicts of Interest
U.S. Supreme Court Enforces Agreement to Arbitrate Discrimination Claims in 14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett
