• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Arbitrability of Wrongful Death Cases

0
by Rob Hargrove

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007


Tweet

Well, the Florida arbitration blog has another interesting post today. It concerns a Missouri case where a court refused to compel arbitration of a wrongful death case against a nursing home. According to that case, since the Missouri wrongful death statute creates a new cause of action in favor of the decedent’s statutory beneficiaries, and it is not a cause of action that the decedent could have had prior to his/her death, the statutory beneficiaries could not be forced to arbitrate their wrongful death claim against a nursing home, notwithstanding the fact that the decedent signed the nursing home admission form, which in turn contained an arbitration clause. (link to a .pdf of the opinion here)

In Texas, of course, we also have a wrongful death statute which sets forth statutory beneficiaries who have the claim; Texas wrongful death claims, in other words, do not belong to the estate of the decedent. Therefore, the Missouri court’s logic ought to apply here in Texas as well. Simply put, since a living person cannot have a wrongful death claim, that person cannot agree to arbitrate one. The decedent’s survival claims would be a different issue, of course, since those belong to the estate. I suppose we could have a situation where the wrongful death claims are tried but the survival claims must be arbitrated (assuming it’s an FAA case and the TAA’s strict personal injury arbitration requirements are preempted). Or we could have a situation where nursing homes require that potential residents round up all their potential wrongful death beneficiaries (in Texas, parents, spouse and children of the deceased) and make them sign the arbitration clause before admission.

It’s an interesting issue, and I do not know of a Texas case specifically addressing it, although I suppose if I had a quiet moment today I could actually look.

Technorati Tags:
arbitration, ADR, law

Related Posts

  • Supreme Court of Texas Holds TAA Applies Where No Evidence to the Contrary DemonstratedSupreme Court of Texas Holds TAA Applies Where No Evidence to the Contrary Demonstrated
  • Article | Arbitration-Related Litigation in TexasArticle | Arbitration-Related Litigation in Texas
  • Third COA Refuses to Compel ArbitrationThird COA Refuses to Compel Arbitration
  • Houston COA Denies Mandamus Request in Arbitration Dispute between InsurersHouston COA Denies Mandamus Request in Arbitration Dispute between Insurers
  • Fort Worth COA Orders Employment Dispute to ArbitrationFort Worth COA Orders Employment Dispute to Arbitration
  • Texas Supreme Court Holds Agreement to Arbitrate is Not Substantively Unconscionable Despite Unenforceable ProvisionsTexas Supreme Court Holds Agreement to Arbitrate is Not Substantively Unconscionable Despite Unenforceable Provisions

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy