• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Applying the Lessons of International Commercial Arbitration to International Commercial Mediation: A Dispute System Design Analysis

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Jan 11, 2018


Tweet

S.I. Strong, Manley O. Hudson Professor of Law at the University of Missouri School of Law, has published “Applying the Lessons of International Commercial Arbitration to International Commercial Mediation: A Dispute System Design Analysis,” Book chapter in Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford University Press, Catharine Titi and Katia Fach Gomez , eds.) 2018 Forthcoming; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-01.

Here is an abstract of the book chapter:

Traditional analyses of international commercial mediation focus primarily on either the step-by-step process associated with resolution of particular disputes or the relative merits of mediation over alternatives such as transnational litigation or international commercial arbitration. However, there is a significant shortage of comprehensive scholarly examinations of the international mediation regime as a whole, such as those that are recommended by experts in dispute system design (DSD). DSD is a unique area of study, since it does not seek to promote or analyze a particular methodology or process but instead focuses on larger structural issues so as to improve dispute resolution at a systemic level. Only by adopting this type of larger analytical framework can parties, policymakers and scholars truly appreciate the forces influencing decisions relating to the resolution of cross-border business disputes.

Although a full DSD analysis would be beyond the scope of the current discussion, this chapter considers a number of critical design issues relating to international commercial mediation, building off a recent large-scale empirical study conducted by the author in this area of law. Among other things, the chapter applies a default theoretic analysis to the field of international dispute resolution to consider how various visible and invisible ‘nudges’ affect individual and institutional decisions regarding international commercial mediation. In so doing, the discussion not only provides an innovative structural perspective on the interplay between litigation, arbitration and mediation in the international commercial context but also suggests how the existing system might be redesigned to create a more effective means of resolving cross-border business conflicts.

This and other scholarly works authored by Professor Strong are available for download from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit: Raja Habib on Foter.com / CC BY-SA

Related Posts

  • Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: The Next Frontier for International Commercial Arbitration?Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: The Next Frontier for International Commercial Arbitration?
  • Beyond International Commercial Arbitration? the Promise of International Commercial MediationBeyond International Commercial Arbitration? the Promise of International Commercial Mediation
  • International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782
  • Collective Redress Arbitration in the European UnionCollective Redress Arbitration in the European Union
  • Anti-Suit Injunctions in Judicial and Arbitral Procedures in the United StatesAnti-Suit Injunctions in Judicial and Arbitral Procedures in the United States
  • Realizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial MediationRealizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial Mediation

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy