• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Apple and Psystar Agree to Private Mediation

0
by Karl Bayer

Saturday, Oct 18, 2008


Tweet

Apple and Psystar have agreed to a private ADR session to attempt a resolution to the ongoing lawsuit filed by Apple. It appears they opted out of the court-provided ADR options for a private mediation service.

Psystar is a Florida corporation that has received some level of attention over a recent website that sold custom-built computers with Apple’s OS X operating system installed. Such setups, PCs running Macintosh operating systems, are often dubbed “Mac Clones.” Apple places legal restrictions on its software with a license agreement stating that OS X should only be run on its proprietary hardware. Psystar argues that such restrictions are unenforceable and countersued.

It does strike me as strange that anyone can walk into an Apple Store and purchase a copy of OS X, but then would be restricted from installing it on their PC. Indeed, that’s what Psystar was doing – telling its customers that if they purchased OS X, Psystar would install it on the PC for free. They argue their process was an end-around the license agreement.

This is a great look at the advantages of ADR, and a classic case for its usefulness. Psystar is a small company that probably doesn’t want to engage in a drawn out litigation with a monster like Apple, and the last thing Apple wants is a court opinion holding its user license agreement unenforceable. By choosing private mediation, the parties may be able to reach a private settlement that would allow Psystar to cut its losses (or even take home some winnings), and let Apple resolve the issue without showing a chink in its armor.

This should be interesting as it develops.

The initial report:

http://www.macobserver.com/article/2008/10/16.9.shtml

Another article, which contains a link to the full ADR agreement:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10068824-37.html?part=rss

A few more articles on the suit:

(July) http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-9991572-56.html?tag=mncol;txt

(May) http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-9933896-37.html?tag=mncol;txt

Related Posts

  • Mind the Gap: Bringing Technology to the Mediation TableMind the Gap: Bringing Technology to the Mediation Table
  • Digital Accessibility and Disability Accommodations in Online Dispute Resolution: ODR for EveryoneDigital Accessibility and Disability Accommodations in Online Dispute Resolution: ODR for Everyone
  • Chinese Universities Lead the World in AI-Related Patent Applications and Research PublicationsChinese Universities Lead the World in AI-Related Patent Applications and Research Publications
  • Expanding Access to Remedies Through E-Court InitiativesExpanding Access to Remedies Through E-Court Initiatives
  • Toyota Offers Royalty-Free Access to Hybrid Vehicle PatentsToyota Offers Royalty-Free Access to Hybrid Vehicle Patents
  • Robot Mediator Settles Court Case for the First TimeRobot Mediator Settles Court Case for the First Time

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Karl Bayer

Karl Bayer is an ADR practitioner with almost thirty years of of experience in litigation, mediation, and arbitration. A long-time successful trial lawyer, Karl recognized early the opportunities which ADR provided to the world of litigation and began to explore the potential of his mediation practice. As he had already earned the respect and trust of both the plaintiffs' and the defense bars, he filled a niche in Austin as a mediator who is requested by both sides of most disputes. He has spoken extensively about ADR and technical topics, both at CLE presentations and as an adjunct professor at The University of Texas School of Law.

Karl also serves frequently as a pre-trial special master in federal district courts in Texas. While this service is often in the capacity of a Markman Master in patent infringement cases, he also serves as a general pre-trial master assisting judges and litigants as they wade through discovery and other pretrial procedural disputes.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy