• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Agreeing to Collaborate in Advance?

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Oct 03, 2017


Tweet

Kristen Blankley, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Nebraska College of Law, has published “Agreeing to Collaborate in Advance?,” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2017.  In her paper, Professor Blankley examines whether a pre-dispute agreement to utilize collaborative law should be enforced by the judicial system.

The abstract states:

Collaborative law is steadily gaining popularity and acceptance as a way to solve legal disputes without the intervention of the court system. Under collaborative law, the attorneys are litigation-only counsel, and counsel and the parties agree to forego traditional litigation processes, such as discovery and motion practice, in favor of collaboration, free exchange of information, and settlement. An unexplored question exists regarding whether parties can agree in advance to use collaborative law in the event of a future dispute between the parties, much in the way parties commonly agree to arbitrate or mediate in a pre-dispute agreement (PDA). This Article examines the enforceability of PDAs for arbitration, mediation, and negotiation to predict that a PDA for collaborative law would not be enforced by the courts or should be enforced under collaborative law policy.

This and other scholarly articles written by Professor Blankley are available for download from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit: Foter.com

Related Posts

  • Is a Mediator Like a Bus? How Legal Ethics May Inform the Question of Case Discrimination by MediatorsIs a Mediator Like a Bus? How Legal Ethics May Inform the Question of Case Discrimination by Mediators
  • Digital Accessibility and Disability Accommodations in Online Dispute Resolution: ODR for EveryoneDigital Accessibility and Disability Accommodations in Online Dispute Resolution: ODR for Everyone
  • International Investment Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Guide to Web Based ResourcesInternational Investment Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Guide to Web Based Resources
  • Does ADR’s “Access to Justice” Come at the Expense of Meaningful Consent?Does ADR’s “Access to Justice” Come at the Expense of Meaningful Consent?
  • Public Litigation, Private Arbitration?Public Litigation, Private Arbitration?
  • Precedent and Dialogue in Investment Treaty ArbitrationPrecedent and Dialogue in Investment Treaty Arbitration

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy