• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Accountable Care Organization Workshop Held

0
by Beth Graham

Friday, Oct 08, 2010


Tweet

On October 5, 2010 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) co-hosted a “Workshop Regarding Accountable Care Organizations and Implications Regarding Antitrust, Physican Self-Referral, Anti-Kickback and Civil Monetary Penalty Laws.” The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General joined the FTC in addressing several issues associated with Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) newly authorized by the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Don Berwick, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, began the workshop by outlining his triple aim for health care: better care for individuals, better health for populations and reduced per-capita costs. He also committed the government to interpreting applicable statutes “wisely, so as not to impede the development of ACOs.” (from HealthBlawg) FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz and the Department of Health and Human Services’ Inspector General Dan Levinson echoed Berwick’s commitment.

Why is this important? As we blogged last month, health care providers are eager to enter into new, more efficient care models but are concerned by several legal barriers to clinical integration and the implementation of ACOs. Legal barriers include: antitrust laws, the Stark Law, the Civil Monetary Penalty Law, the anti-kickback law and the Internal Revenue Code.

Another reason for widespread interest is that Section 3022 of the ACA authorizes health care providers to establish ACOs in order to participate in a Medicare Shared Savings Program (Title XVIII, Section 1899). According to “Preliminary Questions & Answers” guidance promulgated by the CMS Office of Legislation:

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) improves the health care delivery system through incentives to enhance quality, improve beneficiary outcomes and increase value of care. One of these key delivery system reforms is the encouragement of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). ACOs facilitate coordination and cooperation among providers to improve the quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries and reduce unnecessary costs.

The statute requires health care organizations to meet certain requirements in order to qualify as an ACO:

1) Have a formal legal structure to receive and distribute shared savings

2) Have a sufficient number of primary care professionals for the number of assigned beneficiaries (to be 5,000 at a minimum)

3) Agree to participate in the program for not less than a 3-year period

4) Have sufficient information regarding participating ACO health care professionals as the Secretary determines necessary to support beneficiary assignment and for the determination of payments for shared savings.

5) Have a leadership and management structure that includes clinical and administrative systems

6) Have defined processes to (a) promote evidenced-based medicine, (b) report the necessary data to evaluate quality and cost measures (this could incorporate requirements of other programs, such as the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI), Electronic Prescribing (eRx), and Electronic Health Records (EHR), and (c) coordinate care

7) Demonstrate it meets patient-centeredness criteria, as determined by the Secretary.

The statute also specifies who may form an ACO:

1) Physicians and other professionals in group practices

2) Physicians and other professionals in networks of practices

3) Partnerships or joint venture arrangements between hospitals and physicians/professionals

4) Hospitals employing physicians/professionals

5) Other forms that the Secretary of Health and Human Services may determine appropriate.

Medicare Shared Savings Programs are slated to “begin by January 1, 2012. Agreements will begin for performance periods, to be at least three years, on or after that date.” Additionally, “[f]urther details for the shared savings program will be provided in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking which CMS expects to publish this fall.”

The workshop agenda may be viewed here.

Interestingly, HealthBlawg tweeted a live transcript of the workshop here.

Technorati Tags: Mediation

Related Posts

  • What is an Accountable Care Organization (ACO)?What is an Accountable Care Organization (ACO)?
  • Implementation of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)Implementation of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)
  • Observations on Physician ManagementObservations on Physician Management
  • Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) in Central TexasAccountable Care Organizations (ACO) in Central Texas
  • Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Regulations ProposedAccountable Care Organization (ACO) Regulations Proposed
  • Can Clinical Integration Reform Healthcare?Can Clinical Integration Reform Healthcare?

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy