• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


ABA / Straus Institute Survey of Corporate Counsel

0
by Thomas J. Stipanowich

Friday, Jul 18, 2014


Tweet

One of the three recent surveys undertaken by the Straus Institute in 2013 as part of the Theory-to-Practice Research Project was a survey of corporate counsel co-sponsored by the American Bar Association’s Section on Public Utilities, Communication and Transportation (PUCAT) ADR Committee.  The Institute’s work was conducted pursuant to a contractual agreement with PUCAT.

Here is some initial information regarding the Survey:

Survey Group

  • A total of thirty-three individuals responded to the survey.
  • The survey group included corporate lawyers for companies in the electricity, communication, petroleum/gas, infrastructure/pipeline, aviation, cable TV, Internet and railroad industries.
  • Forty percent of respondents were general counsels for their companies.
  • Approximately a quarter (24%) described themselves as mainly concerned with litigation; another quarter were primarily focused on transactional/administrative matters, and the remaining half (52%) were concerned with both.

 

Forthcoming analyses

The survey data includes insights on:

  • Corporate use of mediation, arbitration, early neutral evaluation, early case assessment and other approaches for different kinds of disputes
  • Factors affecting the use of mediation or arbitration
  • Impact of mediator attributes, professional background on mediator selection
  • Impact of arbitrator attributes, professional background on arbitrator selection
  • Preferred methods for neutral selection
  • Role of non-lawyers in arbitration
  • Factors in selecting the location of arbitration hearings
  • Incidence of court activities in conjunction with arbitration
  • Time spent negotiating dispute resolution provisions, involvement of business and legal stakeholders
  • Nature of contractual dispute resolution provisions
  • Use of streamlined or fast-track procedures

 

The final published version of our analysis of the Fortune 1,000 Corporate Counsel Survey, Living with ADR, will lead off the new volume of the Harvard Negotiation Law Review.

Read more on the Straus Institue Theory-to-Practice Research Project.

Read more on the survey of experienced arbitrators.

Read more on the survey of experienced mediators.

 

Thank you, Mr. Stipanowich, for sharing your surveys! 

 

Related Posts

  • The Straus Institute Theory-to-Practice Research ProjectThe Straus Institute Theory-to-Practice Research Project
  • ABA – CLE on July 14 | Deal or No Deal: Improving the Odds of Successful MediationABA – CLE on July 14 | Deal or No Deal: Improving the Odds of Successful Mediation
  • Karl Bayer and Disputing Featured by ABA, Texas Bar TodayKarl Bayer and Disputing Featured by ABA, Texas Bar Today
  • Three Surveys Offering New Insights into ADR PracticesThree Surveys Offering New Insights into ADR Practices
  • International Academy of Mediators (IAM) / Straus Institute Survey on Mediator Practices and PerceptionsInternational Academy of Mediators (IAM) / Straus Institute Survey on Mediator Practices and Perceptions
  • College of Commercial Arbitrators (CCA) / Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution Survey on Arbitration Practice (Fall 2013)College of Commercial Arbitrators (CCA) / Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution Survey on Arbitration Practice (Fall 2013)

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Thomas Stipanowich

Thomas J. Stipanowich is William H. Webster Chair in Dispute Resolution and Professor of Law at Pepperdine University, as well as Academic Director of the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution. The Straus Institute was ranked number one among academic dispute resolution programs each of the last seven years by U.S. News & World Report. He was co-author, with Ian Macneil and Richard Speidel, of the groundbreaking five-volume treatise Federal Arbitration Law: Agreements, Awards & Remedies under the Federal Arbitration Act, cited by the Supreme Court and many other federal and state courts, which was named Best New Legal Book by the Association of American Publishers. He also co-authored Resolving Disputes: Theory, Law and Practice, a law school course book supplemented by many practical exercises. He is the author of many other much-cited publications on arbitration and dispute resolution, and has twice won the CPR Institute's First Prize for Professional Articles (1987 and 2009)--most recently for "Arbitration: The 'New Litigation.'" In 2008, he was given the D'Alemberte/Raven Award, the ABA Dispute Resolution Section's highest honor, for contributions to the field.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy