• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


48 New Mediators Sworn In to Nevada Foreclosure Mediation Program

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Nov 15, 2010


Tweet

On October 27th, 48 new mediators were sworn in to the State of Nevada Foreclosure Mediation Program (FMP). This brings the total number of authorized FMP mediators in Nevada to 293. The FMP was created by Assembly Bill 149 during the 2009 Nevada Legislature session. According to a June 21, 2010 fact sheet:

The FMP applies to residential properties located in Nevada that are owner occupied and the primary home of the owners. Additional eligibility requirements include a Notice of Default (NOD) and Election to Sell that was filed with the County Recorder on or after July 1, 2009. Homeowners that received a NOD prior to July 1, 2009 and meet the other requirements listed above may agree with their lender to opt into the FMP upon written agreement to the FMP Administrator.

Under the program, an eligible homeowner has 30 days after receiving a NOD to request mediation. A nonrefundable mediation fee of $200 and a “Financial Statement and Housing Affordability Worksheet” are also required from the homeowner. Once a lender receives notice that a homeowner has elected to participate in the FMP, it must participate in good faith in the mediation. After the lender pays an additional $200 mediation fee, Nevada Supreme Court Rules require that a mediation take place within 135 days.

Within 10 days after a mediation concludes, the mediator must file a Mediator Statement with the FMP. If not satisfied with the outcome of mediation, either party may petition for judicial review within 15 days of receiving the Mediator Statement.

Between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010, 79,232 Notices of Default were reported for all properties across Nevada, 8,738 FMP mediations were requested and 4,212 FMP mediations were completed. 46% of mediations completed resulted in the homeowners remaining in their homes and 89% ended with a result other than foreclosure.

Prior to being sworn in, the 48 new mediators attended a two and a half day training session which focused “on the foreclosure and modification process, mediation skills and FMP procedures. The mediators consist of Nevada attorneys and professional mediators.”

You can read the entire article from the Nevada Judiciary here.

Over the last few months, Disputing discussed the mid-year statistics for the Third Circuit Court of Hawaii’s Foreclosure Mediation Pilot Project here, state-mandated foreclosure mediation in Florida here and Connecticut’s Home Foreclosure Mediation Program here.

Technorati Tags:
ADR, law, mediation

Related Posts

  • Nevada Revises Foreclosure Mediation ProgramNevada Revises Foreclosure Mediation Program
  • Nevada’s Foreclosure Mediation Program Set to EndNevada’s Foreclosure Mediation Program Set to End
  • Law Review Article | Integrating ‘Alternative’ Dispute Resolution into Bankruptcy: As Simple (and Pure) as Motherhood and Apple Pie?Law Review Article | Integrating ‘Alternative’ Dispute Resolution into Bankruptcy: As Simple (and Pure) as Motherhood and Apple Pie?
  • Foreclosure Mediation Legislation Referred to Senate Judiciary CommitteeForeclosure Mediation Legislation Referred to Senate Judiciary Committee
  • District of Columbia Adopts Foreclosure Mediation ProcessDistrict of Columbia Adopts Foreclosure Mediation Process
  • Connecticut Judicial Branch Reports Home Foreclosure Mediation Program StatisticsConnecticut Judicial Branch Reports Home Foreclosure Mediation Program Statistics

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy